PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMPAX vs. FASPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMPAX vs. FASPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class A (FMPAX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMPAX achieves a 19.04% return, which is significantly lower than FASPX's 20.76% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FMPAX having a 10.95% annualized return and FASPX not far behind at 10.60%.


FMPAX

1D
1.26%
1M
4.53%
YTD
19.04%
6M
20.18%
1Y
36.77%
3Y*
22.03%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
10.95%

FASPX

1D
0.32%
1M
3.43%
YTD
20.76%
6M
22.32%
1Y
39.62%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
7.82%
10Y*
10.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMPAX vs. FASPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMPAX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class A
19.04%12.75%14.22%22.18%-10.89%33.60%0.68%23.19%-19.16%16.73%
FASPX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M
20.76%7.76%-2.60%19.93%-7.82%32.65%7.70%33.85%-17.27%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FMPAX and FASPX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.96

The correlation between FMPAX and FASPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMPAX vs. FASPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMPAX
FMPAX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FMPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FMPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FASPX
FASPX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FASPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FASPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMPAX vs. FASPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class A (FMPAX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMPAXFASPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

4.30

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.48

15.87

-1.38

FMPAX vs. FASPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the FASPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMPAX and FASPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMPAXFASPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.49

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.38

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.48

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.41

-0.02

Drawdowns

FMPAX vs. FASPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMPAX drawdown since its inception was -63.15%, smaller than the maximum FASPX drawdown of -70.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMPAX and FASPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMPAXFASPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.15%

-70.11%

+6.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.34%

-9.84%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.79%

-34.53%

+10.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.79%

-34.53%

+10.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.47%

-48.02%

+2.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.73%

-9.83%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.66%

+0.02%

Volatility

FMPAX vs. FASPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class A (FMPAX) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) at 4.27%. This indicates that FMPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMPAXFASPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

4.27%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.04%

11.92%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.22%

17.00%

-0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.18%

20.68%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.12%

22.01%

-0.89%

FMPAX vs. FASPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMPAX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than FASPX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMPAX vs. FASPX - Dividend Comparison

FMPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, less than FASPX's 7.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASPX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M
7.72%9.32%0.00%2.40%1.93%7.80%0.55%4.98%15.67%7.26%21.61%0.80%
FMPAX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class A
6.57%8.24%10.38%0.96%13.09%1.08%1.78%1.61%14.62%8.77%1.11%4.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FMPAX and FASPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FMPAX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to FASPX (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMPAX dropped -63.15% vs FASPX's -70.11%.

FASPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMPAX and FASPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer