PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMKT vs. DDTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMKT vs. DDTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Free Markets ETF (FMKT) and Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMKT achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than DDTL's 5.21% return.


FMKT

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.05%
6M
-3.05%
YTD
1.44%
1Y
6.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DDTL

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.64%
6M
4.48%
YTD
5.21%
1Y
11.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMKT vs. DDTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FMKT and DDTL is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025

0.58

The correlation between FMKT and DDTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMKT vs. DDTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMKT
FMKT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

DDTL
DDTL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DDTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDTL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DDTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDTL Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMKT vs. DDTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Free Markets ETF (FMKT) and Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMKTDDTLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.44

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

3.03

-2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.92

15.76

-14.84

FMKT vs. DDTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMKT Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the DDTL Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMKT and DDTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMKT vs. DDTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMKT drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, which is greater than DDTL's maximum drawdown of -3.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMKT and DDTL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMKTDDTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-3.78%

-14.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.79%

-3.78%

-14.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.96%

-0.36%

-7.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.48%

-0.43%

-5.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.04%

0.72%

+6.32%

Volatility

FMKT vs. DDTL - Volatility Comparison

The Free Markets ETF (FMKT) has a higher volatility of 3.41% compared to Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL) at 1.06%. This indicates that FMKT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMKTDDTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

1.06%

+2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.83%

4.06%

+10.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.59%

5.34%

+14.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.23%

5.56%

+13.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.23%

5.56%

+13.67%

FMKT vs. DDTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMKT has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than DDTL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMKT vs. DDTL - Dividend Comparison

FMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, while DDTL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


FMKT and DDTL have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMKT has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to DDTL (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMKT dropped -17.79% vs DDTL's -3.78%.

On 1-year performance, DDTL leads with 11.38% vs 6.48% for FMKT. On fees, FMKT is cheaper at 0.76% per year. On volatility, DDTL has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DDTL has performed better with a 11.38% return vs 6.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMKT is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTL.

FMKT has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.00% for DDTL.

FMKT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DDTL is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for FMKT and 0.79% for DDTL.

DDTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMKT and DDTL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer