PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMIUX vs. BSCMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMIUX vs. BSCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FMI Common Stock Fund Institutional Class (FMIUX) and Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMIUX achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly lower than BSCMX's 15.52% return.


FMIUX

1D
0.28%
1M
2.17%
YTD
8.62%
6M
9.04%
1Y
13.03%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*

BSCMX

1D
0.43%
1M
0.65%
YTD
15.52%
6M
19.38%
1Y
43.87%
3Y*
25.40%
5Y*
15.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMIUX vs. BSCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FMIUX
FMI Common Stock Fund Institutional Class
8.62%2.20%10.53%25.01%-5.83%30.64%5.91%24.95%-10.45%
BSCMX
Brandes Small Cap Value Fund
15.52%23.51%24.77%22.75%-7.89%27.61%20.38%12.82%-12.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FMIUX and BSCMX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2018

0.84

The correlation between FMIUX and BSCMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMIUX vs. BSCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMIUX
FMIUX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FMIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FMIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCMX
BSCMX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BSCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMIUX vs. BSCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMI Common Stock Fund Institutional Class (FMIUX) and Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMIUXBSCMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

2.52

-1.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.19

3.58

-2.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.42

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

4.43

-3.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.11

15.09

-12.98

FMIUX vs. BSCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMIUX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the BSCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMIUX and BSCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMIUXBSCMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

2.52

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.87

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.69

-0.15

Drawdowns

FMIUX vs. BSCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMIUX drawdown since its inception was -38.04%, roughly equal to the maximum BSCMX drawdown of -38.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIUX and BSCMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMIUXBSCMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.04%

-38.12%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.78%

-9.65%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.27%

-22.34%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.27%

-22.34%

+1.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.90%

-1.41%

-3.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-6.04%

+1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.50%

2.83%

+2.67%

Volatility

FMIUX vs. BSCMX - Volatility Comparison

FMI Common Stock Fund Institutional Class (FMIUX) and Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) have volatilities of 4.80% and 4.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMIUXBSCMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

4.58%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

11.66%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

17.38%

-0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.66%

17.89%

+0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.54%

20.61%

-1.07%

FMIUX vs. BSCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMIUX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than BSCMX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMIUX vs. BSCMX - Dividend Comparison

FMIUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.36%, more than BSCMX's 3.93% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSCMX
Brandes Small Cap Value Fund
3.93%4.54%2.31%3.50%2.93%4.38%1.76%1.11%9.02%0.00%
FMIUX
FMI Common Stock Fund Institutional Class
12.36%13.42%2.14%2.92%6.76%12.56%0.85%5.01%10.33%11.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMIUX and BSCMX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMIUX has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to BSCMX (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMIUX dropped -38.04% vs BSCMX's -38.12%.

BSCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMIUX and BSCMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer