PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMINX vs. FRDPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMINX vs. FRDPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund (FMINX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMINX achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than FRDPX's 5.86% return. Over the past 10 years, FMINX has underperformed FRDPX with an annualized return of 1.77%, while FRDPX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.41% annualized return.


FMINX

1D
0.18%
1M
0.72%
YTD
1.52%
6M
2.08%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
4.30%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
1.77%

FRDPX

1D
0.47%
1M
3.39%
YTD
5.86%
6M
5.39%
1Y
15.37%
3Y*
12.13%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMINX vs. FRDPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMINX
Franklin Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund
1.52%5.51%1.98%5.37%-10.66%0.60%5.13%7.21%0.32%3.68%
FRDPX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund
5.86%11.96%10.92%12.10%-10.69%26.62%16.29%29.83%-5.27%17.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FMINX and FRDPX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 1987

-0.00

The correlation between FMINX and FRDPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMINX vs. FRDPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMINX
FMINX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FMINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FMINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMINX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FRDPX
FRDPX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FRDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMINX vs. FRDPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund (FMINX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMINXFRDPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.66

1.60

+1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.07

2.32

+1.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.28

+0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.28

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.08

8.91

+0.17

FMINX vs. FRDPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMINX Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the FRDPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMINX and FRDPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMINXFRDPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

1.60

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.56

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.67

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.61

+0.51

Drawdowns

FMINX vs. FRDPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMINX drawdown since its inception was -18.49%, smaller than the maximum FRDPX drawdown of -51.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMINX and FRDPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMINXFRDPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.49%

-51.57%

+33.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.41%

-7.10%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.48%

-18.26%

+10.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

-21.07%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.46%

-34.89%

+18.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

0.00%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.19%

-5.81%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

1.82%

-0.91%

Volatility

FMINX vs. FRDPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund (FMINX) is 1.30%, while Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) has a volatility of 2.29%. This indicates that FMINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRDPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMINXFRDPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

2.29%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.38%

7.70%

-5.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.15%

10.15%

-7.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.62%

15.36%

-10.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.39%

17.18%

-12.79%

FMINX vs. FRDPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMINX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than FRDPX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMINX vs. FRDPX - Dividend Comparison

FMINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than FRDPX's 9.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMINX
Franklin Minnesota Tax-Free Income Fund
3.19%4.20%3.65%2.57%2.53%1.94%2.13%3.10%2.95%2.63%3.10%3.17%
FRDPX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund
9.66%10.25%10.15%4.60%4.96%4.42%0.82%3.01%5.20%0.90%3.09%5.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMINX and FRDPX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRDPX has higher volatility (2.29%) compared to FMINX (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMINX dropped -18.49% vs FRDPX's -51.57%.

FMINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMINX and FRDPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer