FMILX vs. FGINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX).
FMILX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 28, 1992. FGINX is managed by Delaware Funds. It was launched on Oct 4, 1993.
Performance
FMILX vs. FGINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FMILX vs. FGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMILX Fidelity New Millennium Fund | -3.19% | 12.97% | 28.83% | 25.37% | -1.56% | 23.92% | 5.73% | 26.17% | -6.31% | 19.00% |
FGINX Delaware Growth and Income Fund | 4.63% | 29.78% | 15.13% | 11.98% | 3.03% | 21.37% | -0.08% | 25.64% | -10.27% | 18.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMILX achieves a -3.19% return, which is significantly lower than FGINX's 4.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FMILX has outperformed FGINX with an annualized return of 13.84%, while FGINX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.18% annualized return.
FMILX
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -5.14%
- YTD
- -3.19%
- 6M
- -4.43%
- 1Y
- 15.45%
- 3Y*
- 18.24%
- 5Y*
- 13.35%
- 10Y*
- 13.84%
FGINX
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 29.67%
- 3Y*
- 21.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FMILX vs. FGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMILX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FGINX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FMILX vs. FGINX — Risk / Return Rank
FMILX
FGINX
FMILX vs. FGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMILX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 1.84 | -1.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 2.47 | -1.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.38 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 2.55 | -1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.05 | 10.90 | -6.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMILX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 1.84 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 1.01 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.72 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.53 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FMILX and FGINX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FMILX vs. FGINX - Dividend Comparison
FMILX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FGINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.86%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMILX Fidelity New Millennium Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.64% | 3.87% | 4.19% | 8.25% | 8.60% | 4.72% | 18.25% | 7.84% | 6.65% | 11.99% |
FGINX Delaware Growth and Income Fund | 10.86% | 11.28% | 12.40% | 7.11% | 7.04% | 11.97% | 6.59% | 51.75% | 25.36% | 5.13% | 4.12% | 5.66% |
Drawdowns
FMILX vs. FGINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMILX drawdown since its inception was -58.56%, which is greater than FGINX's maximum drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMILX and FGINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMILX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.56% | -54.80% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.11% | -11.56% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.48% | -16.21% | -4.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.92% | -37.37% | -1.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.96% | -5.46% | -3.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.51% | -9.74% | -2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 2.70% | +0.84% |
Volatility
FMILX vs. FGINX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX) at 4.24%. This indicates that FMILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FMILX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 4.24% | +1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.86% | 9.01% | +2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.80% | 16.22% | +3.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 14.88% | +1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 17.04% | +0.95% |