PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMIL vs. PSMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FMIL vs. PSMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FMIL vs. PSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FMIL
Fidelity New Millennium ETF
-3.67%17.67%27.89%25.07%-0.04%24.53%0.86%
PSMD
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF
-1.77%11.45%12.78%17.46%-4.47%11.23%0.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMIL achieves a -3.67% return, which is significantly lower than PSMD's -1.77% return.


FMIL

1D
3.48%
1M
-5.49%
YTD
-3.67%
6M
-0.80%
1Y
19.26%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
14.40%
10Y*

PSMD

1D
1.56%
1M
-2.40%
YTD
-1.77%
6M
0.79%
1Y
11.20%
3Y*
11.24%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FMIL vs. PSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMIL has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than PSMD's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FMIL vs. PSMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMIL
FMIL Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FMIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMIL Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FMIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMIL Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

PSMD
PSMD Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
PSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMIL vs. PSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMILPSMDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

1.12

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.55

1.71

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.29

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

1.53

+0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.14

8.66

-1.52

FMIL vs. PSMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMIL Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the PSMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMIL and PSMD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMILPSMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

1.12

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.95

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

1.03

+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between FMIL and PSMD is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FMIL vs. PSMD - Dividend Comparison

FMIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, while PSMD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
FMIL
Fidelity New Millennium ETF
1.14%1.10%0.82%0.57%1.67%1.68%0.89%
PSMD
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.47%0.00%

Drawdowns

FMIL vs. PSMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMIL drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, which is greater than PSMD's maximum drawdown of -11.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIL and PSMD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FMILPSMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-11.96%

-7.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-7.51%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

-11.96%

-7.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.85%

-2.89%

-3.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.05%

-1.71%

-1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

1.32%

+1.44%

Volatility

FMIL vs. PSMD - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD) at 3.10%. This indicates that FMIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FMILPSMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.13%

3.10%

+3.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

4.39%

+5.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.67%

10.09%

+8.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

8.60%

+8.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.78%

8.56%

+9.22%