FMIHX vs. YFSIX
FMIHX (FMI Large Cap Fund) and YFSIX (AMG Yacktman Global Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FMIHX returned 4.61%/yr vs 9.09%/yr for YFSIX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMIHX charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YFSIX.
Performance
FMIHX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMIHX achieves a -1.65% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 27.94% return.
FMIHX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- -1.65%
- 6M
- -2.08%
- 1Y
- 0.78%
- 3Y*
- 9.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.61%
- 10Y*
- 8.95%
YFSIX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 27.94%
- 6M
- 15.38%
- 1Y
- 32.86%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- —
FMIHX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMIHX FMI Large Cap Fund | -1.65% | 6.21% | 10.17% | 21.03% | -14.73% | 18.40% | 10.23% | 23.66% | -4.10% | 15.90% |
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund | 27.94% | 14.91% | -0.34% | 16.64% | -9.15% | 13.13% | 18.46% | 24.40% | 2.18% | 20.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMIHX and YFSIX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FMIHX and YFSIX has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMIHX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank
FMIHX
YFSIX
FMIHX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMI Large Cap Fund (FMIHX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMIHX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.37 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 2.31 | -2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.46 | 7.30 | -6.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMIHX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | 1.54 | -1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.59 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.82 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
FMIHX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMIHX drawdown since its inception was -47.80%, which is greater than YFSIX's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIHX and YFSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMIHX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.80% | -35.10% | -12.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -14.20% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.23% | -14.20% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.99% | -25.14% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.02% | -0.24% | -6.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.92% | -4.90% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.68% | 4.47% | +0.21% |
Volatility
FMIHX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FMI Large Cap Fund (FMIHX) is 3.36%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that FMIHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMIHX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 5.82% | -2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.88% | 20.77% | -10.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.17% | 21.35% | -8.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 15.39% | +2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 16.25% | +1.37% |
FMIHX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMIHX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMIHX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison
FMIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.11%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMIHX FMI Large Cap Fund | 16.11% | 15.84% | 13.22% | 10.54% | 22.62% | 17.10% | 11.56% | 7.77% | 20.37% | 9.27% | 7.48% | 11.02% |
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.68% | 8.02% | 4.32% | 8.18% | 4.76% | 6.59% | 0.71% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMIHX and YFSIX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YFSIX has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to FMIHX (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMIHX dropped -47.80% vs YFSIX's -35.10%.
YFSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMIHX and YFSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer