FMIFX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FMIFX (FMI International Fund II - Currency Unhedged Institutional Class) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FMIFX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FMIFX returned 2.46%/yr vs 16.66%/yr for FBGRX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMIFX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

FMIFX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FMI International Fund II - Currency Unhedged Institutional Class (FMIFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMIFX achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 18.19% return.

FMIFX

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -0.18%
• YTD: -0.84%
• 6M: 0.02%
• 1Y: 2.48%
• 3Y*: 7.33%
• 5Y*: 2.46%
• 10Y*: —

FBGRX

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 7.83%
• YTD: 18.19%
• 6M: 19.03%
• 1Y: 43.35%
• 3Y*: 32.41%
• 5Y*: 16.66%
• 10Y*: 21.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMIFX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FMIFX FMI International Fund II - Currency Unhedged Institutional Class	-0.84%	13.92%	2.22%	21.74%	-17.35%	9.20%	3.94%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	18.19%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FMIFX and FBGRX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020	0.62

The correlation between FMIFX and FBGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FMIFX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMIFX

FMIFX Risk / Return Rank: 4
FMIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FMIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FMIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FMIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FMIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMIFX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMI International Fund II - Currency Unhedged Institutional Class (FMIFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FMIFX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.17	2.57	-2.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.37	3.31	-2.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.44	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.18	3.54	-3.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.56	14.99	-14.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FMIFX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMIFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMIFX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FMIFX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17	2.57	-2.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	0.67	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.68	-0.44

Drawdowns

FMIFX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMIFX drawdown since its inception was -39.39%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIFX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMIFX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.39%	-58.64%	+19.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.17%	-12.65%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.54%	-27.07%	+9.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.90%	-43.08%	+9.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.52%	-0.31%	-7.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.43%	-12.53%	+4.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.77%	2.98%	+1.79%

Volatility

FMIFX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

FMI International Fund II - Currency Unhedged Institutional Class (FMIFX) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 4.19%. This indicates that FMIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMIFX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.44%	4.19%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.45%	13.01%	-0.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.74%	17.43%	-1.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.72%	24.88%	-9.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.67%	23.68%	-5.01%

FMIFX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMIFX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMIFX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FMIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, more than FBGRX's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.61%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
FMIFX FMI International Fund II - Currency Unhedged Institutional Class	6.10%	6.05%	2.30%	1.51%	1.41%	4.41%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMIFX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

FMIFX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FMIFX or FBGRX?

FMIFX has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to FBGRX (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMIFX dropped -39.39% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.