FMIEX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
FMIEX is managed by Wasatch. It was launched on Sep 25, 1996. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
FMIEX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FMIEX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMIEX Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares | 6.04% | 30.93% | 8.66% | 5.67% | -0.12% | 25.11% | 2.04% | 17.27% | -5.67% | 11.21% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMIEX achieves a 6.04% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FMIEX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 11.03%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
FMIEX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -5.84%
- YTD
- 6.04%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FMIEX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMIEX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FMIEX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
FMIEX
CSUAX
FMIEX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMIEX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.14 | 1.63 | +0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.85 | 2.17 | +0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.32 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 2.36 | +0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.99 | 10.32 | +1.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMIEX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 1.63 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 0.61 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.50 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.55 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between FMIEX and CSUAX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FMIEX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
FMIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, less than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMIEX Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares | 4.95% | 5.76% | 9.02% | 3.27% | 8.54% | 4.34% | 1.74% | 3.82% | 18.46% | 16.45% | 5.16% | 11.75% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
FMIEX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMIEX drawdown since its inception was -49.85%, roughly equal to the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIEX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMIEX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.85% | -52.20% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.34% | -7.98% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.63% | -20.45% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.33% | -35.05% | -4.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.84% | -4.38% | -1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -8.49% | +1.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 1.83% | +0.21% |
Volatility
FMIEX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that FMIEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FMIEX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 3.26% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.70% | 6.89% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 11.48% | +0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.77% | 12.89% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 14.89% | +0.84% |