PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMHI vs. HYMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMHI vs. HYMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Municipal High Income ETF (FMHI) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMHI achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly lower than HYMB's 3.07% return.


FMHI

1D
0.10%
1M
0.99%
YTD
2.68%
6M
3.23%
1Y
8.49%
3Y*
5.36%
5Y*
0.91%
10Y*

HYMB

1D
0.20%
1M
1.19%
YTD
3.07%
6M
3.18%
1Y
7.38%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
0.46%
10Y*
2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMHI vs. HYMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMHI
First Trust Municipal High Income ETF
2.68%3.54%5.41%7.20%-14.67%7.58%4.09%10.34%2.50%1.08%
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
3.07%2.04%5.52%7.73%-15.54%5.16%3.74%9.51%4.91%0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FMHI and HYMB is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.57

Over the past year, FMHI and HYMB have become more correlated (0.78) than their long-term average of 0.57, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMHI vs. HYMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMHI
FMHI Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FMHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FMHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMHI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

HYMB
HYMB Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HYMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMB Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMHI vs. HYMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Municipal High Income ETF (FMHI) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMHIHYMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.37

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

2.39

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.66

8.46

+5.20

FMHI vs. HYMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMHI Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the HYMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMHI and HYMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMHIHYMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

1.83

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.07

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.45

+0.11

Drawdowns

FMHI vs. HYMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMHI drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, smaller than the maximum HYMB drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMHI and HYMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMHIHYMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.83%

-29.57%

+10.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.35%

-3.11%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.17%

-7.44%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.83%

-20.15%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-3.80%

-0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

0.88%

-0.26%

Volatility

FMHI vs. HYMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Municipal High Income ETF (FMHI) is 0.96%, while SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) has a volatility of 1.35%. This indicates that FMHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMHIHYMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

1.35%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.10%

3.14%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12%

4.06%

-0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.76%

6.66%

-1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.73%

11.35%

-5.62%

FMHI vs. HYMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMHI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than HYMB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMHI vs. HYMB - Dividend Comparison

FMHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than HYMB's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMHI
First Trust Municipal High Income ETF
4.24%4.16%4.01%3.89%3.57%2.87%3.13%3.33%3.46%0.30%0.00%0.00%
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
4.54%4.55%4.29%4.07%3.77%3.19%3.55%3.95%4.03%3.78%4.08%4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMHI and HYMB have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYMB has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to FMHI (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMHI dropped -18.83% vs HYMB's -29.57%.

On 5-year performance, FMHI leads with 0.91% vs 0.46% for HYMB. On fees, HYMB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FMHI has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FMHI has performed better with a 0.91% return vs 0.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYMB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FMHI.

HYMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 4.24% for FMHI.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FMHI and 0.35% for HYMB.

FMHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMHI and HYMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer