FMFMX vs. FZROX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FMFMX (Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Growth Fund) and FZROX (Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FMFMX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FZROX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FMFMX returned 12.53%/yr vs 12.06%/yr for FZROX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.00% expense ratio.

Performance

FMFMX vs. FZROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Growth Fund (FMFMX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMFMX achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly higher than FZROX's 8.84% return.

FMFMX

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: 9.56%
• 6M: 8.14%
• 1Y: 20.89%
• 3Y*: 23.04%
• 5Y*: 12.53%
• 10Y*: 19.40%

FZROX

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -1.53%
• YTD: 8.84%
• 6M: 7.39%
• 1Y: 22.95%
• 3Y*: 20.73%
• 5Y*: 12.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMFMX vs. FZROX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FMFMX Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Growth Fund	9.56%	14.98%	30.90%	37.23%	-23.65%	18.56%	45.18%	35.17%	-12.19%
FZROX Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund	8.84%	17.23%	23.94%	26.20%	-19.21%	26.00%	20.51%	31.15%	-12.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FMFMX and FZROX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018	0.92

The correlation between FMFMX and FZROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FMFMX vs. FZROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMFMX

FMFMX Risk / Return Rank: 27
FMFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FMFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FMFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FMFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
FMFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

FZROX

FZROX Risk / Return Rank: 56
FZROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FZROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FZROX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FZROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FZROX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMFMX vs. FZROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Growth Fund (FMFMX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FMFMX	FZROX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	1.78	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	2.44	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.32	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	2.58	-0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.05	11.45	-5.40

FMFMX vs. FZROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMFMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the FZROX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMFMX and FZROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FMFMX vs. FZROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMFMX drawdown since its inception was -36.89%, which is greater than FZROX's maximum drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMFMX and FZROX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMFMX	FZROX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.89%	-34.96%	-1.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.60%	-8.89%	-3.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.89%	-19.38%	-17.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.89%	-25.12%	-11.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.35%	-2.83%	-2.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.30%	-5.48%	-1.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.48%	2.00%	+1.48%

Volatility

FMFMX vs. FZROX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Growth Fund (FMFMX) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) at 5.01%. This indicates that FMFMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMFMX	FZROX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.54%	5.01%	+2.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.09%	10.15%	+3.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.61%	12.91%	+4.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.05%	17.54%	+7.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.04%	20.12%	+2.92%

FMFMX vs. FZROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMFMX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FZROX's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FMFMX vs. FZROX - Dividend Comparison

FMFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.27%, more than FZROX's 0.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMFMX Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Growth Fund	13.27%	14.54%	28.50%	5.57%	5.69%	16.12%	27.01%	13.51%	9.43%	18.29%	0.12%	0.15%
FZROX Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund	0.94%	1.02%	1.16%	1.36%	1.57%	1.25%	1.27%	1.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMFMX and FZROX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FMFMX and FZROX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FMFMX or FZROX?

FMFMX has higher volatility (7.54%) compared to FZROX (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMFMX dropped -36.89% vs FZROX's -34.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FZROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.