FMET vs. DDM
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET) and ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM).
FMET and DDM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FMET is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 19, 2022. DDM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006.
Performance
FMET vs. DDM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FMET vs. DDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMET Fidelity Metaverse ETF | -12.10% | 21.93% | 6.76% | 39.18% | -16.56% |
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | -7.34% | 20.59% | 21.60% | 24.34% | -11.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMET achieves a -12.10% return, which is significantly lower than DDM's -7.34% return.
FMET
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -4.50%
- YTD
- -12.10%
- 6M
- -15.78%
- 1Y
- 13.47%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDM
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -9.73%
- YTD
- -7.34%
- 6M
- -1.68%
- 1Y
- 16.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.19%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 17.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FMET vs. DDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMET has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DDM's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FMET vs. DDM — Risk / Return Rank
FMET
DDM
FMET vs. DDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET) and ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMET | DDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 0.49 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | 0.92 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.13 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 0.77 | -0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.84 | 2.63 | -0.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMET | DDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 0.49 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.37 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between FMET and DDM is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FMET vs. DDM - Dividend Comparison
FMET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than DDM's 1.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMET Fidelity Metaverse ETF | 0.63% | 0.81% | 0.44% | 0.40% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 1.08% | 0.94% | 1.00% | 0.27% | 0.83% | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.62% | 0.89% | 0.68% | 1.08% | 1.23% |
Drawdowns
FMET vs. DDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMET drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, smaller than the maximum DDM drawdown of -81.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMET and DDM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMET | DDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.22% | -81.70% | +52.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.00% | -20.92% | -2.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.14% | -14.36% | -4.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.49% | -17.44% | +9.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.99% | 6.12% | +1.87% |
Volatility
FMET vs. DDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET) is 7.52%, while ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) has a volatility of 9.85%. This indicates that FMET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FMET | DDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.52% | 9.85% | -2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.01% | 18.54% | -3.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.41% | 33.55% | -9.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.29% | 29.42% | -5.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.29% | 34.69% | -10.40% |