PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMDGX vs. EEOFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FMDGX vs. EEOFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) and Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FMDGX vs. EEOFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FMDGX
Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund
-6.36%8.60%22.03%25.79%-26.67%12.67%34.84%4.63%
EEOFX
Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund
0.37%23.55%1.32%-1.53%-27.88%10.83%62.80%2.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMDGX achieves a -6.36% return, which is significantly lower than EEOFX's 0.37% return.


FMDGX

1D
3.60%
1M
-6.39%
YTD
-6.36%
6M
-9.60%
1Y
8.49%
3Y*
12.67%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*

EEOFX

1D
3.58%
1M
-6.79%
YTD
0.37%
6M
-0.31%
1Y
33.61%
3Y*
5.36%
5Y*
-1.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FMDGX vs. EEOFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMDGX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than EEOFX's 2.11% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FMDGX vs. EEOFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMDGX
FMDGX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FMDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FMDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

EEOFX
EEOFX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EEOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
EEOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMDGX vs. EEOFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) and Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMDGXEEOFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.41

1.52

-1.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.76

2.12

-1.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.27

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

2.09

-1.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.97

6.79

-4.82

FMDGX vs. EEOFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMDGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the EEOFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMDGX and EEOFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMDGXEEOFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

1.52

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

-0.07

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.28

+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between FMDGX and EEOFX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FMDGX vs. EEOFX - Dividend Comparison

FMDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than EEOFX's 0.06% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
FMDGX
Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund
1.98%1.85%0.47%0.63%0.81%6.43%0.36%0.29%
EEOFX
Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund
0.06%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.01%6.63%1.62%0.00%

Drawdowns

FMDGX vs. EEOFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMDGX drawdown since its inception was -38.59%, smaller than the maximum EEOFX drawdown of -50.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMDGX and EEOFX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FMDGXEEOFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.59%

-50.17%

+11.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.75%

-13.49%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.59%

-50.17%

+11.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.68%

-22.58%

+10.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.34%

-19.83%

+8.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

4.28%

+0.42%

Volatility

FMDGX vs. EEOFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) is 6.94%, while Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX) has a volatility of 7.95%. This indicates that FMDGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEOFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FMDGXEEOFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

7.95%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.16%

16.62%

-3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.17%

23.25%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.41%

24.89%

-2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.50%

24.72%

-0.22%