FMCX vs. TEXN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FMCX (FMC Excelsior Focus Equity ETF) and TEXN (iShares Texas Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FMCX is actively managed, while TEXN is passively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMCX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TEXN.

Performance

FMCX vs. TEXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FMC Excelsior Focus Equity ETF (FMCX) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMCX achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly lower than TEXN's 25.94% return.

FMCX

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 2.47%
• YTD: 6.51%
• 6M: 4.99%
• 1Y: 16.25%
• 3Y*: 16.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TEXN

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 5.35%
• YTD: 25.94%
• 6M: 24.41%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMCX vs. TEXN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FMCX FMC Excelsior Focus Equity ETF	6.51%	6.33%
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF	25.94%	8.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FMCX and TEXN is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.55

FMCX vs. TEXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FMCX	TEXN
Technology	31.2%	15.5%
Industrials	21.3%	16.9%
Consumer Cyclical	15.5%	10.8%
Financial Services	13.6%	4.1%
Healthcare	9.3%	2.9%
Communication Services	5.3%	3.6%
Basic Materials	3.8%	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.1%
Energy	-	36.1%
Real Estate	-	4.2%
Utilities	-	2.9%

Return for Risk

FMCX vs. TEXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMCX

FMCX Risk / Return Rank: 33
FMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMCX vs. TEXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMC Excelsior Focus Equity ETF (FMCX) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FMCX	TEXN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.54	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FMCX	TEXN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	2.75	-2.07

Drawdowns

FMCX vs. TEXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMCX drawdown since its inception was -17.70%, which is greater than TEXN's maximum drawdown of -6.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCX and TEXN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMCX	TEXN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.70%	-6.34%	-11.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.17%	-0.24%	-0.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.29%	-1.12%	-3.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.59%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FMCX	TEXN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.70%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.56%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.91%	14.19%	-1.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.24%	14.19%	+2.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.24%	14.19%	+2.05%

FMCX vs. TEXN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMCX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TEXN's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMCX vs. TEXN - Dividend Comparison

FMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than TEXN's 1.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FMCX FMC Excelsior Focus Equity ETF	0.33%	0.35%	2.12%	1.34%	1.19%
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF	1.01%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMCX and TEXN in my portfolio?

FMCX and TEXN have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FMCX or TEXN?

On fees, TEXN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FMCX or TEXN?

TEXN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FMCX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FMCX or TEXN?

TEXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.33% for FMCX.

What is the main difference between FMCX and TEXN?

They also come from different issuers: First Manhattan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FMCX and 0.20% for TEXN.