PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMCSX vs. TLVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMCSX vs. TLVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) and Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value Fund (TLVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMCSX achieves a 17.37% return, which is significantly higher than TLVAX's 9.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FMCSX has outperformed TLVAX with an annualized return of 12.77%, while TLVAX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.18% annualized return.


FMCSX

1D
1.64%
1M
3.81%
YTD
17.37%
6M
18.71%
1Y
31.34%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
10.35%
10Y*
12.77%

TLVAX

1D
1.37%
1M
0.81%
YTD
9.03%
6M
7.41%
1Y
11.59%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
10.08%
10Y*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMCSX vs. TLVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMCSX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund
17.37%11.80%14.55%11.02%-6.40%28.64%11.43%25.39%-6.67%18.03%
TLVAX
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value Fund
9.03%4.80%23.59%13.21%-11.70%26.86%13.07%26.39%-8.93%17.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FMCSX and TLVAX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 1999

0.86

The correlation between FMCSX and TLVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMCSX vs. TLVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMCSX
FMCSX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FMCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

TLVAX
TLVAX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TLVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TLVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMCSX vs. TLVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) and Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value Fund (TLVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMCSXTLVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.20

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

1.72

+2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.86

5.10

+9.76

FMCSX vs. TLVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMCSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the TLVAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMCSX and TLVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMCSXTLVAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.11

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.63

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.65

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.46

+0.12

Drawdowns

FMCSX vs. TLVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMCSX drawdown since its inception was -62.19%, which is greater than TLVAX's maximum drawdown of -55.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCSX and TLVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMCSXTLVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.19%

-55.23%

-6.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-7.46%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.33%

-14.96%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.33%

-20.69%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.55%

-37.34%

-3.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.92%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.35%

-8.23%

-1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

2.51%

-0.31%

Volatility

FMCSX vs. TLVAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value Fund (TLVAX) at 3.19%. This indicates that FMCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMCSXTLVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

3.19%

+1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.28%

8.73%

+3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.58%

11.53%

+4.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.72%

16.09%

+1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.60%

17.34%

+1.26%

FMCSX vs. TLVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMCSX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than TLVAX's 1.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMCSX vs. TLVAX - Dividend Comparison

FMCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than TLVAX's 8.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMCSX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund
1.56%1.83%8.94%2.60%5.44%12.80%6.72%6.63%18.48%6.66%8.25%14.18%
TLVAX
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value Fund
8.41%9.16%20.11%0.86%5.52%4.35%3.39%11.83%10.96%6.78%1.25%12.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMCSX and TLVAX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMCSX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to TLVAX (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMCSX dropped -62.19% vs TLVAX's -55.23%.

FMCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMCSX and TLVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer