PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMCSX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMCSX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMCSX achieves a 18.50% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 7.14% return. Over the past 10 years, FMCSX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 13.30%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.85% annualized return.


FMCSX

1D
-1.30%
1M
3.35%
YTD
18.50%
6M
16.08%
1Y
30.31%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
13.30%

FCNTX

1D
-1.37%
1M
0.58%
YTD
7.14%
6M
6.01%
1Y
19.55%
3Y*
25.94%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*
17.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMCSX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMCSX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund
18.50%11.80%14.55%11.02%-6.40%28.64%11.43%25.39%-6.67%18.03%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
7.14%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FMCSX and FCNTX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 1994

0.84

The correlation between FMCSX and FCNTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMCSX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMCSX
FMCSX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FMCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMCSX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMCSXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.25

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

1.88

+1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.22

7.84

+6.38

FMCSX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMCSX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMCSX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMCSX drawdown since its inception was -62.19%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCSX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMCSXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.19%

-49.19%

-13.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-11.30%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.33%

-19.75%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.33%

-32.59%

+10.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.55%

-32.59%

-7.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-3.92%

+2.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.34%

-8.15%

-1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

2.70%

-0.47%

Volatility

FMCSX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) is 5.74%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that FMCSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMCSXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.74%

6.50%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.91%

11.91%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.25%

15.14%

+1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.78%

19.33%

-1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.59%

19.73%

-1.14%

FMCSX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMCSX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMCSX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FMCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, more than FCNTX's 4.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.36%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FMCSX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund
5.23%1.83%8.94%2.60%5.44%12.80%6.72%6.63%18.48%6.66%8.25%14.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMCSX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCNTX has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to FMCSX (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMCSX dropped -62.19% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FMCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMCSX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer