FMCSX vs. FAGKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) and Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund Class K (FAGKX).
FMCSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 29, 1994. FAGKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008.
Performance
FMCSX vs. FAGKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FMCSX vs. FAGKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMCSX Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund | 1.46% | 11.80% | 14.55% | 11.02% | -6.40% | 28.64% | 11.43% | 25.39% | -6.67% | 18.03% |
FAGKX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund Class K | -7.23% | 3.13% | 17.83% | 21.07% | -26.41% | 21.43% | 29.49% | 36.75% | -6.77% | 21.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMCSX achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly higher than FAGKX's -7.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FMCSX has outperformed FAGKX with an annualized return of 11.64%, while FAGKX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.61% annualized return.
FMCSX
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -7.66%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 4.65%
- 1Y
- 20.42%
- 3Y*
- 12.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.62%
- 10Y*
- 11.64%
FAGKX
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -11.55%
- YTD
- -7.23%
- 6M
- -18.03%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- 8.03%
- 5Y*
- 4.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FMCSX vs. FAGKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMCSX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FAGKX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FMCSX vs. FAGKX — Risk / Return Rank
FMCSX
FAGKX
FMCSX vs. FAGKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) and Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund Class K (FAGKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMCSX | FAGKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | 0.14 | +0.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 0.38 | +1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.05 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | -0.01 | +1.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.36 | -0.03 | +6.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMCSX | FAGKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 0.14 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.17 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.44 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.36 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between FMCSX and FAGKX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FMCSX vs. FAGKX - Dividend Comparison
FMCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, while FAGKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMCSX Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund | 1.81% | 1.83% | 8.94% | 2.60% | 5.44% | 12.80% | 6.72% | 6.63% | 18.48% | 6.66% | 8.25% | 14.18% |
FAGKX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund Class K | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 13.99% | 8.30% | 3.73% | 0.90% | 0.05% | 0.72% | 0.29% |
Drawdowns
FMCSX vs. FAGKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMCSX drawdown since its inception was -62.19%, which is greater than FAGKX's maximum drawdown of -54.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCSX and FAGKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMCSX | FAGKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.19% | -54.37% | -7.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.27% | -20.29% | +7.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.33% | -36.57% | +14.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.55% | -36.57% | -3.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.55% | -20.29% | +11.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -10.12% | +0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 7.04% | -4.11% |
Volatility
FMCSX vs. FAGKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) is 6.50%, while Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund Class K (FAGKX) has a volatility of 7.61%. This indicates that FMCSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAGKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FMCSX | FAGKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 7.61% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.90% | 17.93% | -6.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.89% | 26.56% | -6.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 23.31% | -5.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.50% | 21.96% | -3.46% |