PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMCKX vs. FQEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMCKX vs. FQEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class C (FMCKX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMCKX achieves a 23.12% return, which is significantly lower than FQEMX's 63.91% return.


FMCKX

1D
1.70%
1M
-3.36%
6M
11.20%
YTD
23.12%
1Y
41.83%
3Y*
23.03%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
10.58%
ALL TIME*
8.34%

FQEMX

1D
3.95%
1M
-5.97%
6M
38.76%
YTD
63.91%
1Y
106.15%
3Y*
41.37%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FMCKX vs. FQEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FMCKX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class C
23.12%38.72%8.19%7.32%-20.72%-5.07%
FQEMX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM
63.91%55.98%6.67%12.18%-20.68%0.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FMCKX and FQEMX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2021

0.83

The correlation between FMCKX and FQEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMCKX vs. FQEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FMCKX
FMCKX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FMCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FQEMX
FQEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FQEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FQEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FMCKX vs. FQEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class C (FMCKX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMCKXFQEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.49

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

4.05

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.30

14.44

-5.13

FMCKX vs. FQEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMCKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is lower than the FQEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMCKX and FQEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMCKX vs. FQEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMCKX drawdown since its inception was -70.33%, which is greater than FQEMX's maximum drawdown of -34.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCKX and FQEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMCKXFQEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.33%

-34.46%

-35.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.79%

-26.96%

+13.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

-26.96%

+7.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.54%

-14.89%

+7.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.87%

-10.83%

-11.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.62%

7.51%

-2.89%

Volatility

FMCKX vs. FQEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class C (FMCKX) is 8.37%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX) has a volatility of 16.41%. This indicates that FMCKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMCKXFQEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.37%

16.41%

-8.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.24%

35.94%

-15.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.32%

38.07%

-15.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.73%

24.00%

-4.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.20%

24.00%

-4.80%

FMCKX vs. FQEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMCKX has a 2.11% expense ratio, which is higher than FQEMX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMCKX vs. FQEMX - Dividend Comparison

FMCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than FQEMX's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FMCKX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class C
0.57%0.70%0.11%0.53%0.00%4.23%1.27%11.09%
FQEMX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM
1.94%3.18%3.15%4.82%3.93%0.62%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMCKX and FQEMX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FQEMX has higher volatility (16.41%) compared to FMCKX (8.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMCKX dropped -70.33% vs FQEMX's -34.46%.

FQEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMCKX and FQEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer