PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMCDX vs. FZFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMCDX vs. FZFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A (FMCDX) and Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMCDX achieves a 17.24% return, which is significantly lower than FZFLX's 31.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FMCDX has underperformed FZFLX with an annualized return of 11.64%, while FZFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.89% annualized return.


FMCDX

1D
0.20%
1M
2.82%
YTD
17.24%
6M
18.31%
1Y
30.88%
3Y*
16.09%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
11.64%

FZFLX

1D
-0.68%
1M
4.45%
YTD
31.03%
6M
32.60%
1Y
48.15%
3Y*
23.77%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
13.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMCDX vs. FZFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMCDX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A
17.24%10.17%8.89%16.86%-14.11%22.92%12.77%29.26%-7.82%19.57%
FZFLX
Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
31.03%10.76%15.52%17.75%-15.62%20.40%19.78%31.96%-9.25%18.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FMCDX and FZFLX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2015

0.97

The correlation between FMCDX and FZFLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMCDX vs. FZFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMCDX
FMCDX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FMCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FZFLX
FZFLX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FZFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FZFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMCDX vs. FZFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A (FMCDX) and Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMCDXFZFLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.92

2.33

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.75

3.09

-0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.41

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

4.49

-1.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.98

19.03

-6.05

FMCDX vs. FZFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMCDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the FZFLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMCDX and FZFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMCDXFZFLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

2.33

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.55

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.66

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.62

-0.12

Drawdowns

FMCDX vs. FZFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMCDX drawdown since its inception was -65.00%, which is greater than FZFLX's maximum drawdown of -42.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCDX and FZFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMCDXFZFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.00%

-42.03%

-22.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.70%

-10.68%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.19%

-22.29%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.19%

-24.77%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.40%

-42.03%

-1.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.84%

+1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.64%

-5.74%

-4.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.52%

-0.19%

Volatility

FMCDX vs. FZFLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A (FMCDX) is 4.57%, while Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX) has a volatility of 7.30%. This indicates that FMCDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMCDXFZFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

7.30%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

17.66%

-5.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.05%

20.84%

-4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.01%

21.10%

-1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.00%

21.10%

-0.10%

FMCDX vs. FZFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMCDX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FZFLX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMCDX vs. FZFLX - Dividend Comparison

FMCDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.32%, less than FZFLX's 44.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMCDX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A
7.32%8.58%0.00%0.61%10.14%13.43%2.25%4.16%21.85%4.30%1.03%9.17%
FZFLX
Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
44.09%57.77%10.20%2.35%79.79%50.77%7.19%6.49%7.69%1.68%0.93%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FMCDX and FZFLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FZFLX has higher volatility (7.30%) compared to FMCDX (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMCDX dropped -65.00% vs FZFLX's -42.03%.

FZFLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMCDX and FZFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer