PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMCAX vs. FSMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMCAX vs. FSMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class M (FMCAX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMCAX achieves a 18.33% return, which is significantly higher than FSMAX's 13.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FMCAX having a 11.54% annualized return and FSMAX not far ahead at 12.06%.


FMCAX

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.03%
YTD
18.33%
6M
17.66%
1Y
30.65%
3Y*
16.31%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
11.54%

FSMAX

1D
-1.00%
1M
3.43%
YTD
13.74%
6M
11.91%
1Y
28.69%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
12.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMCAX vs. FSMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMCAX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class M
18.33%9.87%8.94%16.59%-14.31%22.62%12.48%28.98%-8.06%19.55%
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
13.74%11.40%16.99%25.36%-26.44%12.41%32.28%28.01%-9.44%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FMCAX and FSMAX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.95

The correlation between FMCAX and FSMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMCAX vs. FSMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMCAX
FMCAX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FMCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMAX
FSMAX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FSMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMCAX vs. FSMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class M (FMCAX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMCAXFSMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

2.82

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.06

9.96

+3.11

FMCAX vs. FSMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMCAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the FSMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMCAX and FSMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMCAXFSMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

1.69

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.29

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.40

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.46

+0.03

Drawdowns

FMCAX vs. FSMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMCAX drawdown since its inception was -65.06%, which is greater than FSMAX's maximum drawdown of -50.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCAX and FSMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMCAXFSMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.06%

-50.55%

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.72%

-10.26%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.04%

-26.82%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-36.31%

+11.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.42%

-50.55%

+7.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-1.00%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.96%

-12.16%

+1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

2.90%

-0.56%

Volatility

FMCAX vs. FSMAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class M (FMCAX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) have volatilities of 4.62% and 4.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMCAXFSMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

4.84%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.25%

12.48%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

17.20%

-1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.01%

22.33%

-2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.00%

30.23%

-9.23%

FMCAX vs. FSMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMCAX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMAX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMCAX vs. FSMAX - Dividend Comparison

FMCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, more than FSMAX's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMCAX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class M
6.91%8.17%0.00%0.36%9.72%13.00%2.00%3.87%21.28%4.27%0.51%1.53%
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
0.50%0.57%0.48%1.17%1.90%7.49%2.14%4.30%6.09%5.44%4.85%6.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FMCAX and FSMAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSMAX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to FMCAX (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMCAX dropped -65.06% vs FSMAX's -50.55%.

FMCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMCAX and FSMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer