PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMCAX vs. FSELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMCAX vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class M (FMCAX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMCAX achieves a 18.49% return, which is significantly lower than FSELX's 85.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FMCAX has underperformed FSELX with an annualized return of 11.55%, while FSELX has yielded a comparatively higher 39.21% annualized return.


FMCAX

1D
1.15%
1M
4.56%
YTD
18.49%
6M
18.36%
1Y
30.62%
3Y*
16.36%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*
11.55%

FSELX

1D
6.35%
1M
26.53%
YTD
85.56%
6M
83.27%
1Y
166.37%
3Y*
68.85%
5Y*
46.95%
10Y*
39.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMCAX vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMCAX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class M
18.49%9.87%8.94%16.59%-14.31%22.62%12.48%28.98%-8.06%19.55%
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
85.56%52.17%49.68%78.49%-35.27%59.16%44.33%64.50%-12.01%34.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FMCAX and FSELX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 1996

0.72

The correlation between FMCAX and FSELX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMCAX vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMCAX
FMCAX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FMCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FSELX
FSELX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FSELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSELX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FSELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSELX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMCAX vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class M (FMCAX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMCAXFSELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.71

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

12.18

-8.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.76

46.77

-33.01

FMCAX vs. FSELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is lower than the FSELX Sharpe Ratio of 5.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMCAX and FSELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMCAXFSELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

5.35

-3.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

1.21

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

1.12

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.55

-0.06

Drawdowns

FMCAX vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMCAX drawdown since its inception was -65.06%, smaller than the maximum FSELX drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCAX and FSELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMCAXFSELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.06%

-82.54%

+17.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.72%

-14.38%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.04%

-36.31%

+11.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-46.37%

+21.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.42%

-46.37%

+2.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.96%

-28.70%

+17.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

3.74%

-1.40%

Volatility

FMCAX vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class M (FMCAX) is 4.67%, while Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) has a volatility of 12.01%. This indicates that FMCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMCAXFSELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

12.01%

-7.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.26%

25.42%

-13.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

32.74%

-16.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.01%

38.97%

-18.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.01%

35.07%

-14.06%

FMCAX vs. FSELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMCAX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FSELX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMCAX vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison

FMCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, less than FSELX's 8.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMCAX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class M
6.90%8.17%0.00%0.36%9.72%13.00%2.00%3.87%21.28%4.27%0.51%1.53%
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
8.83%11.11%7.97%7.20%6.69%6.99%8.13%3.36%26.80%14.44%3.82%15.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMCAX and FSELX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSELX has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to FMCAX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMCAX dropped -65.06% vs FSELX's -82.54%.

FSELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.35 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMCAX and FSELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer