FMBPX vs. TBIIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX) and TIAA-CREF Bond Index Fund (TBIIX).
FMBPX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Dec 20, 2007. TBIIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 14, 2009.
Performance
FMBPX vs. TBIIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FMBPX vs. TBIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMBPX Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio | -0.18% | 9.03% | 1.04% | 4.44% | -12.21% | -1.35% | 4.77% | 6.30% | 1.13% | 2.76% |
TBIIX TIAA-CREF Bond Index Fund | -0.49% | 7.12% | 1.13% | 5.13% | -13.61% | -1.81% | 7.69% | 8.58% | -0.25% | 3.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMBPX achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly higher than TBIIX's -0.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FMBPX having a 1.45% annualized return and TBIIX not far behind at 1.42%.
FMBPX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 5.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.90%
- 5Y*
- 0.19%
- 10Y*
- 1.45%
TBIIX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 3.19%
- 5Y*
- -0.09%
- 10Y*
- 1.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FMBPX vs. TBIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMBPX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than TBIIX's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FMBPX vs. TBIIX — Risk / Return Rank
FMBPX
TBIIX
FMBPX vs. TBIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX) and TIAA-CREF Bond Index Fund (TBIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMBPX | TBIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | 0.96 | +0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.87 | 1.38 | +0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.17 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 1.68 | +0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | 4.81 | +1.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMBPX | TBIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 0.96 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | -0.02 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.54 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between FMBPX and TBIIX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FMBPX vs. TBIIX - Dividend Comparison
FMBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than TBIIX's 3.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMBPX Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio | 4.60% | 4.87% | 4.29% | 3.46% | 2.29% | 1.96% | 2.68% | 3.23% | 3.14% | 2.83% | 2.72% | 2.65% |
TBIIX TIAA-CREF Bond Index Fund | 3.52% | 3.73% | 3.14% | 2.44% | 2.11% | 2.07% | 3.17% | 2.82% | 2.46% | 2.44% | 2.31% | 2.61% |
Drawdowns
FMBPX vs. TBIIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMBPX drawdown since its inception was -18.34%, smaller than the maximum TBIIX drawdown of -19.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMBPX and TBIIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMBPX | TBIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.34% | -19.33% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.15% | -2.83% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.02% | -18.68% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.34% | -19.33% | +0.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.19% | -4.35% | +2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.29% | -3.68% | +0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | 0.99% | +0.14% |
Volatility
FMBPX vs. TBIIX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX) and TIAA-CREF Bond Index Fund (TBIIX) have volatilities of 1.53% and 1.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FMBPX | TBIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.53% | 1.61% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.02% | 2.68% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.44% | 4.55% | +0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.72% | 6.05% | +0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.08% | 5.00% | +0.08% |