PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMBPX vs. QDIBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FMBPX vs. QDIBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FMBPX vs. QDIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FMBPX
Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio
-0.06%9.03%1.04%4.44%-12.21%-1.35%4.77%0.23%
QDIBX
Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans
0.00%7.72%1.66%6.71%-14.11%-0.17%6.77%-0.10%

Returns By Period


FMBPX

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
1.75%
1Y
5.59%
3Y*
3.94%
5Y*
0.21%
10Y*
1.46%

QDIBX

1D
0.22%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.90%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
0.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FMBPX vs. QDIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMBPX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than QDIBX's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FMBPX vs. QDIBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMBPX
FMBPX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FMBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FMBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

QDIBX
QDIBX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QDIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
QDIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMBPX vs. QDIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMBPXQDIBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

1.06

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.56

1.55

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.19

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

1.81

+0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.03

5.30

+0.74

FMBPX vs. QDIBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMBPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the QDIBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMBPX and QDIBX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMBPXQDIBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

1.06

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.06

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.17

+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between FMBPX and QDIBX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FMBPX vs. QDIBX - Dividend Comparison

FMBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than QDIBX's 3.50% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMBPX
Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio
4.59%4.87%4.29%3.46%2.29%1.96%2.68%3.23%3.14%2.83%2.72%2.65%
QDIBX
Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans
3.50%3.50%3.55%3.65%2.51%1.80%3.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FMBPX vs. QDIBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMBPX drawdown since its inception was -18.34%, smaller than the maximum QDIBX drawdown of -19.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMBPX and QDIBX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FMBPXQDIBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.34%

-19.63%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.15%

-2.58%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.02%

-19.63%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-1.76%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-6.52%

+3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

0.88%

+0.26%

Volatility

FMBPX vs. QDIBX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) have volatilities of 1.50% and 1.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FMBPXQDIBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

1.46%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.02%

2.54%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.43%

4.32%

+1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.72%

6.58%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.08%

6.32%

-1.24%