PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMB vs. ZTAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMB vs. ZTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Managed Municipal ETF (FMB) and X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMB achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than ZTAX's 3.71% return.


FMB

1D
-0.08%
1M
-1.95%
6M
-0.43%
YTD
0.43%
1Y
4.66%
3Y*
3.18%
5Y*
0.26%
10Y*
2.03%
ALL TIME*
2.81%

ZTAX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.78%
6M
3.66%
YTD
3.71%
1Y
9.54%
3Y*
5.01%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.44M$8.53M$7.75M
$9.06K$122.06K$76.67K

FMB vs. ZTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FMB
First Trust Managed Municipal ETF
0.43%3.73%1.94%4.39%
ZTAX
X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF
3.71%-1.02%7.98%3.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FMB and ZTAX is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023

0.03

The correlation between FMB and ZTAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMB vs. ZTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FMB
FMB Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMB Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMB Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

ZTAX
ZTAX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
ZTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FMB vs. ZTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Managed Municipal ETF (FMB) and X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMBZTAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.10

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

0.72

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.46

1.48

+4.98

FMB vs. ZTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the ZTAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMB and ZTAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMB vs. ZTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMB drawdown since its inception was -14.16%, smaller than the maximum ZTAX drawdown of -15.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMB and ZTAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMBZTAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.16%

-15.33%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.73%

-11.26%

+8.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.44%

-15.33%

+10.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-8.94%

+6.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-6.90%

+4.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

5.43%

-4.61%

Volatility

FMB vs. ZTAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Managed Municipal ETF (FMB) is 0.88%, while X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that FMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMBZTAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

6.77%

-5.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.14%

25.70%

-23.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74%

32.80%

-30.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.73%

28.70%

-24.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.53%

28.70%

-24.17%

FMB vs. ZTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ZTAX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMB vs. ZTAX - Dividend Comparison

FMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, less than ZTAX's 4.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMB
First Trust Managed Municipal ETF
3.62%3.37%3.22%2.98%2.47%1.96%2.19%2.47%2.58%2.49%2.93%3.07%
ZTAX
X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF
4.61%4.58%4.55%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMB and ZTAX have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZTAX has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to FMB (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMB dropped -14.16% vs ZTAX's -15.33%.

On 3-year performance, ZTAX leads with 5.01% vs 3.18% for FMB. On fees, FMB is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FMB has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ZTAX has performed better with a 5.01% return vs 3.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMB is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ZTAX.

ZTAX has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 3.62% for FMB.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and X-Square. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FMB and 1.14% for ZTAX.

FMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMB and ZTAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer