FMB vs. RVNU
FMB (First Trust Managed Municipal ETF) and RVNU (Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. FMB is actively managed, while RVNU is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FMB returned 2.35%/yr vs 1.93%/yr for RVNU. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FMB charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for RVNU.
Performance
FMB vs. RVNU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMB achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly lower than RVNU's 3.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FMB has outperformed RVNU with an annualized return of 2.35%, while RVNU has yielded a comparatively lower 1.93% annualized return.
FMB
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 6.91%
- 3Y*
- 3.95%
- 5Y*
- 0.74%
- 10Y*
- 2.35%
RVNU
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 3.90%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- 1Y
- 9.36%
- 3Y*
- 3.44%
- 5Y*
- -0.19%
- 10Y*
- 1.93%
FMB vs. RVNU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMB First Trust Managed Municipal ETF | 1.86% | 3.73% | 1.94% | 6.31% | -9.91% | 2.43% | 4.44% | 8.25% | 0.89% | 7.22% |
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.90% | 0.58% | 1.46% | 11.19% | -16.60% | 2.28% | 6.54% | 10.16% | -0.56% | 8.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMB and RVNU is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2014 | 0.47 |
The correlation between FMB and RVNU shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMB vs. RVNU — Risk / Return Rank
FMB
RVNU
FMB vs. RVNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Managed Municipal ETF (FMB) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMB | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.35 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 3.82 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | 11.40 | -2.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMB | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 1.84 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | -0.03 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.27 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.39 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
FMB vs. RVNU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMB drawdown since its inception was -14.16%, smaller than the maximum RVNU drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMB and RVNU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMB | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.16% | -23.51% | +9.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.73% | -2.46% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.76% | -10.35% | +5.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.16% | -23.51% | +9.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.16% | -23.51% | +9.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -2.63% | +2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -4.98% | +2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.76% | 0.83% | -0.07% |
Volatility
FMB vs. RVNU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Managed Municipal ETF (FMB) is 0.88%, while Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) has a volatility of 1.43%. This indicates that FMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RVNU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMB | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.88% | 1.43% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.91% | 3.41% | -1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67% | 5.12% | -2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.71% | 7.19% | -3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.55% | 7.27% | -2.72% |
FMB vs. RVNU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RVNU's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMB vs. RVNU - Dividend Comparison
FMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, which matches RVNU's 3.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMB First Trust Managed Municipal ETF | 3.50% | 3.37% | 3.22% | 2.98% | 2.47% | 1.96% | 2.19% | 2.47% | 2.58% | 2.49% | 2.93% | 3.07% |
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.51% | 3.46% | 3.06% | 2.79% | 2.81% | 2.18% | 2.43% | 2.75% | 2.76% | 2.49% | 2.72% | 3.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMB and RVNU have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RVNU has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to FMB (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMB dropped -14.16% vs RVNU's -23.51%.
On 10-year performance, FMB leads with 2.35% vs 1.93% for RVNU. On fees, RVNU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FMB has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FMB has performed better with a 2.35% return vs 1.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RVNU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FMB.
FMB and RVNU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 3.50%.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FMB and 0.15% for RVNU.
FMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMB and RVNU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer