FMB vs. MMMA
FMB (First Trust Managed Municipal ETF) and MMMA (NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FMB charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MMMA.
Performance
FMB vs. MMMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMB achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly lower than MMMA's 3.45% return.
FMB
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- 6.75%
- 3Y*
- 3.71%
- 5Y*
- 0.77%
- 10Y*
- 2.20%
MMMA
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 3.45%
- 6M
- 3.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMB vs. MMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FMB First Trust Managed Municipal ETF | 1.96% | 0.46% |
MMMA NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF | 3.45% | 0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMB and MMMA is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMB vs. MMMA — Risk / Return Rank
FMB
MMMA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FMB vs. MMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Managed Municipal ETF (FMB) and NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FMB | MMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FMB vs. MMMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMB drawdown since its inception was -14.16%, which is greater than MMMA's maximum drawdown of -2.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMB and MMMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMB | MMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.16% | -2.79% | -11.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.09% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -0.55% | -2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | — | — |
Volatility
FMB vs. MMMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMB | MMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64% | 4.04% | -1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.71% | 4.04% | -0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 4.04% | +0.49% |
FMB vs. MMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MMMA's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMB vs. MMMA - Dividend Comparison
FMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than MMMA's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMB First Trust Managed Municipal ETF | 3.49% | 3.37% | 3.22% | 2.98% | 2.47% | 1.96% | 2.19% | 2.47% | 2.58% | 2.49% | 2.93% | 3.07% |
MMMA NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF | 1.95% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMB and MMMA have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MMMA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MMMA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FMB.
FMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 1.95% for MMMA.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and NYLI. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FMB and 0.35% for MMMA.
Find the right allocation for FMB and MMMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer