FMAR vs. RDVI

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FMAR (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March) and RDVI (FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FMAR is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by FT Vest, while RDVI is a Derivative Income fund tracking the NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers. FMAR is actively managed, while RDVI is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FMAR returned 13.97%/yr vs 19.02%/yr for RDVI. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FMAR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RDVI.

Performance

FMAR vs. RDVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR) and FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMAR achieves a 11.43% return, which is significantly lower than RDVI's 17.72% return.

FMAR

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 1.12%
• 6M: 10.54%
• YTD: 11.43%
• 1Y: 17.38%
• 3Y*: 13.97%
• 5Y*: 10.60%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.35%

RDVI

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 1.85%
• 6M: 11.76%
• YTD: 17.72%
• 1Y: 30.91%
• 3Y*: 19.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FMAR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March	$817.51K	$684.12K	$1.82M
RDVI FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF	$26.87M	$24.31M	$18.93M

FMAR vs. RDVI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FMAR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March	11.43%	9.69%	14.61%	20.39%	4.55%
RDVI FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF	17.72%	17.93%	14.56%	18.63%	8.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FMAR and RDVI is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2022	0.74

The correlation between FMAR and RDVI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

FMAR vs. RDVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FMAR	RDVI
Technology	37.9%	19.4%
Financial Services	11.7%	38.9%
Communication Services	10.0%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	11.1%
Healthcare	9.1%	5.6%
Industrials	8.4%	12.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	2.8%
Energy	3.0%	2.8%
Utilities	2.3%	1.4%
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

FMAR vs. RDVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FMAR

FMAR Risk / Return Rank: 97
FMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

RDVI

RDVI Risk / Return Rank: 89
RDVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
RDVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
RDVI Omega Ratio Rank: 86
RDVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
RDVI Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FMAR vs. RDVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR) and FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FMAR	RDVI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.35	2.23	+1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.34	3.18	+2.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.79	1.39	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.40	3.66	+3.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	43.08	15.35	+27.73

FMAR vs. RDVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMAR Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is higher than the RDVI Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMAR and RDVI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FMAR vs. RDVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMAR drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, smaller than the maximum RDVI drawdown of -18.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAR and RDVI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMAR	RDVI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.36%	-18.35%	+3.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.36%	-8.48%	+6.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.37%	-18.35%	+5.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.08%	-3.07%	+0.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.40%	2.02%	-1.62%

Volatility

FMAR vs. RDVI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR) is 1.50%, while FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that FMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMAR	RDVI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.50%	3.43%	-1.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.48%	10.90%	-6.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.22%	13.97%	-8.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.45%	16.82%	-6.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.24%	16.82%	-6.58%

FMAR vs. RDVI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVI's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMAR vs. RDVI - Dividend Comparison

FMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RDVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.68%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FMAR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RDVI FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF	7.68%	8.10%	8.62%	8.45%	1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMAR and RDVI in my portfolio?

FMAR and RDVI have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FMAR or RDVI?

RDVI has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to FMAR (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMAR dropped -14.36% vs RDVI's -18.35%.

Which ETF is better, FMAR or RDVI?

On 3-year performance, RDVI leads with 19.02% vs 13.97% for FMAR. On fees, RDVI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FMAR has been the lower-risk option at 1.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FMAR or RDVI?

Over the 3-year period, RDVI has performed better with a 19.02% return vs 13.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FMAR or RDVI?

RDVI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FMAR or RDVI?

RDVI has the higher dividend yield at 7.68%, compared with 0.00% for FMAR.

What is the main difference between FMAR and RDVI?

FMAR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while RDVI is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FMAR and 0.75% for RDVI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.