PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMACX vs. GFFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMACX vs. GFFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds AMCAP Fund® Class F-3 (FMACX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMACX achieves a 3.57% return, which is significantly lower than GFFFX's 6.70% return.


FMACX

1D
0.49%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
3.57%
6M
2.54%
1Y
15.40%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*

GFFFX

1D
0.23%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
6.70%
6M
5.50%
1Y
18.63%
3Y*
23.37%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
16.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMACX vs. GFFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMACX
American Funds AMCAP Fund® Class F-3
3.57%18.07%21.49%31.48%-28.43%22.33%21.81%26.73%-4.12%18.35%
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2
6.70%19.96%28.28%37.51%-30.61%19.55%38.16%28.43%-2.96%20.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FMACX and GFFFX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.97

The correlation between FMACX and GFFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMACX vs. GFFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMACX
FMACX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FMACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMACX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FMACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMACX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

GFFFX
GFFFX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GFFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
GFFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMACX vs. GFFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds AMCAP Fund® Class F-3 (FMACX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMACXGFFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.21

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

1.36

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.36

5.18

-0.82

FMACX vs. GFFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the GFFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMACX and GFFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMACX vs. GFFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMACX drawdown since its inception was -36.00%, roughly equal to the maximum GFFFX drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMACX and GFFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMACXGFFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.00%

-36.26%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.12%

-13.74%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.69%

-21.55%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.00%

-36.26%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.47%

-3.47%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-5.56%

-1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

3.60%

-0.05%

Volatility

FMACX vs. GFFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds AMCAP Fund® Class F-3 (FMACX) is 6.09%, while American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that FMACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMACXGFFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.09%

7.16%

-1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.36%

13.12%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.47%

16.41%

-0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.39%

20.45%

-1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.18%

19.75%

-0.57%

FMACX vs. GFFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMACX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than GFFFX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMACX vs. GFFFX - Dividend Comparison

FMACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.68%, more than GFFFX's 10.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMACX
American Funds AMCAP Fund® Class F-3
12.68%8.62%8.39%3.80%7.46%4.50%4.12%5.16%8.13%5.64%0.00%0.00%
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2
10.26%10.95%9.23%7.64%4.32%8.42%4.51%7.38%12.29%7.27%6.87%9.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FMACX and GFFFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GFFFX has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to FMACX (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMACX dropped -36.00% vs GFFFX's -36.26%.

GFFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMACX and GFFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer