FLYD vs. YXI
FLYD (MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and YXI (ProShares Short FTSE China 50) are both Inverse Equities funds - FLYD tracks the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index while YXI tracks the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLYD returned -55.38%/yr vs -11.86%/yr for YXI. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
FLYD vs. YXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLYD achieves a -13.05% return, which is significantly lower than YXI's 7.60% return.
FLYD
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- -17.48%
- YTD
- -13.05%
- 6M
- -22.60%
- 1Y
- -49.08%
- 3Y*
- -55.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YXI
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- 1Y
- 1.04%
- 3Y*
- -11.86%
- 5Y*
- -2.76%
- 10Y*
- -8.18%
FLYD vs. YXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -13.05% | -60.42% | -54.13% | -75.14% | -46.23% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 7.60% | -22.87% | -25.36% | 12.40% | 5.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLYD and YXI is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2022 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLYD vs. YXI — Risk / Return Rank
FLYD
YXI
FLYD vs. YXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLYD | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.03 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | 0.07 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 0.13 | -1.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLYD | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 | 0.05 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.75 | -0.30 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
FLYD vs. YXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLYD drawdown since its inception was -98.11%, which is greater than YXI's maximum drawdown of -81.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYD and YXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLYD | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.11% | -81.15% | -16.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.89% | -14.21% | -40.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -93.41% | -53.12% | -40.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.99% | -78.03% | -19.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.14% | -54.31% | -28.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.21% | 7.79% | +29.42% |
Volatility
FLYD vs. YXI - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) has a higher volatility of 25.78% compared to ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) at 7.25%. This indicates that FLYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLYD | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.78% | 7.25% | +18.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.42% | 14.87% | +44.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.48% | 19.93% | +54.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.67% | 31.39% | +52.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.67% | 27.42% | +56.25% |
FLYD vs. YXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FLYD and YXI have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
FLYD vs. YXI - Dividend Comparison
FLYD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 2.85% | 3.60% | 4.35% | 2.66% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.01% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLYD and YXI have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLYD has higher volatility (25.78%) compared to YXI (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLYD dropped -98.11% vs YXI's -81.15%.
On 3-year performance, YXI leads with -11.86% vs -55.38% for FLYD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, YXI has been the lower-risk option at 7.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, YXI has performed better with a -11.86% return vs -55.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLYD and YXI have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
YXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 0.00% for FLYD.
FLYD tracks MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index, while YXI tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%). They also come from different issuers: REX and ProShares.
YXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.05 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLYD and YXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer