FLYD vs. ULE
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and ProShares Ultra Euro (ULE).
FLYD and ULE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLYD is a passively managed fund by REX that tracks the performance of the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. It was launched on Jun 22, 2022. ULE is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the USD/EUR Exchange Rate (-200%). It was launched on Nov 25, 2008. Both FLYD and ULE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLYD vs. ULE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLYD vs. ULE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 31.58% | -60.42% | -54.13% | -75.14% | -46.23% |
ULE ProShares Ultra Euro | -3.35% | 25.97% | -11.73% | 5.08% | -0.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLYD achieves a 31.58% return, which is significantly higher than ULE's -3.35% return.
FLYD
- 1D
- -12.05%
- 1M
- 19.00%
- YTD
- 31.58%
- 6M
- 12.07%
- 1Y
- -60.68%
- 3Y*
- -51.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ULE
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- YTD
- -3.35%
- 6M
- -3.64%
- 1Y
- 12.86%
- 3Y*
- 3.45%
- 5Y*
- -2.68%
- 10Y*
- -2.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLYD vs. ULE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FLYD and ULE have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
FLYD vs. ULE — Risk / Return Rank
FLYD
ULE
FLYD vs. ULE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and ProShares Ultra Euro (ULE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLYD | ULE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | 0.69 | -1.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | 1.17 | -1.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.14 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 1.13 | -1.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 2.74 | -3.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLYD | ULE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 | 0.69 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.72 | -0.21 | -0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLYD and ULE is -0.19. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
FLYD vs. ULE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLYD nor ULE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FLYD vs. ULE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLYD drawdown since its inception was -97.96%, which is greater than ULE's maximum drawdown of -72.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYD and ULE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLYD | ULE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.96% | -72.74% | -25.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.41% | -10.40% | -72.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.97% | -62.27% | -34.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.45% | -45.90% | -36.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 72.38% | 4.28% | +68.10% |
Volatility
FLYD vs. ULE - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) has a higher volatility of 27.93% compared to ProShares Ultra Euro (ULE) at 4.84%. This indicates that FLYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLYD | ULE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.93% | 4.84% | +23.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.96% | 9.12% | +45.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.80% | 17.10% | +75.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.50% | 16.21% | +67.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.50% | 15.31% | +68.19% |