FLYD vs. TSLZ
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ).
FLYD and TSLZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLYD is a passively managed fund by REX that tracks the performance of the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. It was launched on Jun 22, 2022. TSLZ is an actively managed fund by T-Rex. It was launched on Oct 18, 2023.
Performance
FLYD vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLYD vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 26.36% | -60.42% | -54.13% | -50.52% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 26.84% | -75.98% | -88.79% | -28.07% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FLYD having a 26.36% return and TSLZ slightly higher at 26.84%.
FLYD
- 1D
- -3.97%
- 1M
- 7.80%
- YTD
- 26.36%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- 1Y
- -62.53%
- 3Y*
- -52.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLZ
- 1D
- -5.23%
- 1M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- 26.84%
- 6M
- 12.94%
- 1Y
- -80.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLYD vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLYD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLYD vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank
FLYD
TSLZ
FLYD vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLYD | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | -0.73 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | -1.18 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.85 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.91 | +0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | -1.05 | +0.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLYD | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.67 | -0.73 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.72 | -0.66 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLYD and TSLZ is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FLYD vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison
FLYD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.54% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% |
Drawdowns
FLYD vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLYD drawdown since its inception was -97.96%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYD and TSLZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLYD | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.96% | -99.11% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.41% | -90.53% | +8.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.09% | -98.67% | +1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.46% | -73.71% | -8.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 72.53% | 78.12% | -5.59% |
Volatility
FLYD vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) has a higher volatility of 28.29% compared to T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) at 22.93%. This indicates that FLYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLYD | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.29% | 22.93% | +5.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.96% | 58.42% | -3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.87% | 110.05% | -17.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.48% | 119.08% | -35.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.48% | 119.08% | -35.60% |