PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLYD vs. TSDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLYD vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLYD vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FLYD
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs
26.36%-60.42%-54.13%-29.53%
TSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF
28.07%-74.84%-89.21%-20.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLYD achieves a 26.36% return, which is significantly lower than TSDD's 28.07% return.


FLYD

1D
-3.97%
1M
7.80%
YTD
26.36%
6M
5.01%
1Y
-62.53%
3Y*
-52.14%
5Y*
10Y*

TSDD

1D
-5.17%
1M
8.20%
YTD
28.07%
6M
15.45%
1Y
-79.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLYD vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLYD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSDD's 1.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLYD vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLYD
FLYD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FLYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLYD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FLYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLYD Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

TSDD
TSDD Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
TSDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSDD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
TSDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSDD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLYD vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLYDTSDDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.67

-0.73

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.73

-1.13

+0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.86

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

-0.90

+0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.86

-1.04

+0.18

FLYD vs. TSDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLYD Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is comparable to the TSDD Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLYD and TSDD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLYDTSDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.67

-0.73

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.72

-0.65

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between FLYD and TSDD is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLYD vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison

FLYD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%.


TTM202520242023
FLYD
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF
6.58%8.42%0.00%24.84%

Drawdowns

FLYD vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLYD drawdown since its inception was -97.96%, roughly equal to the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYD and TSDD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLYDTSDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.96%

-99.03%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.41%

-90.32%

+7.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.09%

-98.53%

+1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.46%

-69.41%

-13.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

72.53%

77.90%

-5.37%

Volatility

FLYD vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) has a higher volatility of 28.29% compared to GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) at 22.84%. This indicates that FLYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLYDTSDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.29%

22.84%

+5.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.96%

59.58%

-4.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.87%

110.35%

-17.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.48%

116.23%

-32.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.48%

116.23%

-32.75%