PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLYD vs. MSFD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLYD vs. MSFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLYD vs. MSFD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FLYD
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs
31.58%-60.42%-54.13%-75.14%-1.71%
MSFD
Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares
28.73%-13.36%-7.86%-35.90%3.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLYD achieves a 31.58% return, which is significantly higher than MSFD's 28.73% return.


FLYD

1D
-12.05%
1M
19.00%
YTD
31.58%
6M
12.07%
1Y
-60.68%
3Y*
-51.49%
5Y*
10Y*

MSFD

1D
-3.15%
1M
6.11%
YTD
28.73%
6M
38.42%
1Y
-0.32%
3Y*
-7.18%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLYD vs. MSFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLYD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFD's 1.06% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLYD vs. MSFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLYD
FLYD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FLYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLYD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FLYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLYD Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFD
MSFD Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MSFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFD Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFD Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLYD vs. MSFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLYDMSFDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.66

-0.01

-0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.66

0.17

-0.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.02

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

0.02

-0.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.83

0.03

-0.86

FLYD vs. MSFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLYD Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the MSFD Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLYD and MSFD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLYDMSFDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.66

-0.01

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.72

-0.39

-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between FLYD and MSFD is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FLYD vs. MSFD - Dividend Comparison

FLYD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%.


TTM2025202420232022
FLYD
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFD
Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares
2.43%3.33%4.46%4.43%0.74%

Drawdowns

FLYD vs. MSFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLYD drawdown since its inception was -97.96%, which is greater than MSFD's maximum drawdown of -59.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYD and MSFD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLYDMSFDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.96%

-59.90%

-38.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.41%

-34.84%

-47.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.97%

-41.94%

-55.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.45%

-41.28%

-41.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

72.38%

25.22%

+47.16%

Volatility

FLYD vs. MSFD - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) has a higher volatility of 27.93% compared to Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) at 6.60%. This indicates that FLYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLYDMSFDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.93%

6.60%

+21.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.96%

18.84%

+36.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.80%

26.78%

+66.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.50%

25.77%

+57.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.50%

25.77%

+57.73%