PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLYD vs. FIAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLYD vs. FIAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLYD achieves a -11.20% return, which is significantly lower than FIAT's 13.84% return.


FLYD

1D
3.25%
1M
-18.38%
YTD
-11.20%
6M
-19.27%
1Y
-48.13%
3Y*
-55.26%
5Y*
10Y*

FIAT

1D
4.32%
1M
16.99%
YTD
13.84%
6M
33.71%
1Y
-0.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLYD vs. FIAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FLYD
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs
-11.20%-60.42%-44.47%
FIAT
YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
13.84%-24.17%-28.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FLYD and FIAT is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLYD vs. FIAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLYD
FLYD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FLYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLYD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FLYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLYD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

FIAT
FIAT Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FIAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIAT Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FIAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIAT Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLYD vs. FIAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLYDFIATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.65

-0.00

-0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.67

0.37

-1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.05

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.88

-0.00

-0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.30

-0.01

-1.29

FLYD vs. FIAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLYD Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the FIAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLYD and FIAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLYDFIATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.65

-0.00

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.75

-0.37

-0.37

Drawdowns

FLYD vs. FIAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLYD drawdown since its inception was -98.11%, which is greater than FIAT's maximum drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYD and FIAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLYDFIATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.11%

-70.50%

-27.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.89%

-42.26%

-12.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-93.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.95%

-50.94%

-47.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.12%

-45.35%

-37.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.06%

27.32%

+9.74%

Volatility

FLYD vs. FIAT - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) has a higher volatility of 25.85% compared to YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT) at 15.34%. This indicates that FLYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLYDFIATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.85%

15.34%

+10.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.48%

42.03%

+17.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.47%

55.49%

+18.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.70%

60.56%

+23.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.70%

60.56%

+23.14%

FLYD vs. FIAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLYD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FIAT's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLYD vs. FIAT - Dividend Comparison

FLYD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 93.28%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FLYD and FIAT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLYD has higher volatility (25.85%) compared to FIAT (15.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLYD dropped -98.11% vs FIAT's -70.50%.

On 1-year performance, FIAT leads with -0.18% vs -48.13% for FLYD. On fees, FLYD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, FIAT has been the lower-risk option at 15.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FIAT has performed better with a -0.18% return vs -48.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLYD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for FIAT.

FIAT has the higher dividend yield at 93.28%, compared with 0.00% for FLYD.

FLYD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while FIAT is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: REX and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FLYD and 0.99% for FIAT.

FIAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.00 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLYD and FIAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer