FLYD vs. EFZ
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ).
FLYD and EFZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLYD is a passively managed fund by REX that tracks the performance of the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. It was launched on Jun 22, 2022. EFZ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index (-100%). It was launched on Oct 23, 2007. Both FLYD and EFZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLYD vs. EFZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLYD vs. EFZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 26.36% | -60.42% | -54.13% | -75.14% | -46.23% |
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE | -1.90% | -20.92% | 2.90% | -10.38% | -6.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLYD achieves a 26.36% return, which is significantly higher than EFZ's -1.90% return.
FLYD
- 1D
- -3.97%
- 1M
- 7.80%
- YTD
- 26.36%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- 1Y
- -62.53%
- 3Y*
- -52.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFZ
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- -1.90%
- 6M
- -4.62%
- 1Y
- -17.15%
- 3Y*
- -8.28%
- 5Y*
- -5.63%
- 10Y*
- -8.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLYD vs. EFZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FLYD and EFZ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
FLYD vs. EFZ — Risk / Return Rank
FLYD
EFZ
FLYD vs. EFZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLYD | EFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | -0.93 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | -1.28 | +0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.84 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.56 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | -0.80 | -0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLYD | EFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.67 | -0.93 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.72 | -0.33 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLYD and EFZ is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FLYD vs. EFZ - Dividend Comparison
FLYD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE | 3.83% | 4.55% | 5.29% | 4.66% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 1.56% | 0.34% |
Drawdowns
FLYD vs. EFZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLYD drawdown since its inception was -97.96%, which is greater than EFZ's maximum drawdown of -88.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYD and EFZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLYD | EFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.96% | -88.08% | -9.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.41% | -30.95% | -51.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.09% | -87.16% | -9.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.46% | -66.89% | -15.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 72.53% | 21.50% | +51.03% |
Volatility
FLYD vs. EFZ - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) has a higher volatility of 28.29% compared to ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) at 7.78%. This indicates that FLYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLYD | EFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.29% | 7.78% | +20.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.96% | 12.37% | +42.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.87% | 18.52% | +74.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.48% | 16.54% | +66.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.48% | 17.31% | +66.17% |