FLYD vs. CARD

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FLYD (MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Inverse Equities funds - FLYD tracks the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index while CARD tracks the Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FLYD returned -55.29% vs -35.50% for CARD. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

FLYD vs. CARD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLYD achieves a -30.35% return, which is significantly lower than CARD's 4.05% return.

FLYD

• 1D: 3.79%
• 1M: -24.33%
• YTD: -30.35%
• 6M: -26.65%
• 1Y: -55.29%
• 3Y*: -56.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CARD

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 2.67%
• YTD: 4.05%
• 6M: 16.62%
• 1Y: -35.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLYD vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	-30.35%	-60.42%	-54.13%	-28.02%
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	4.05%	-60.21%	-58.19%	-32.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FLYD and CARD is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023	0.65

The correlation between FLYD and CARD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLYD vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLYD

FLYD Risk / Return Rank: 2
FLYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FLYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FLYD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FLYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
FLYD Martin Ratio Rank: 0

CARD

CARD Risk / Return Rank: 5
CARD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CARD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
CARD Omega Ratio Rank: 6
CARD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CARD Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLYD vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLYD	CARD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.73	-0.51	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.90	-0.39	-0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	0.96	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.01	-0.77	-0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-2.07	-1.14	-0.93

FLYD vs. CARD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLYD Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the CARD Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLYD and CARD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLYD vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLYD drawdown since its inception was -98.45%, which is greater than CARD's maximum drawdown of -93.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYD and CARD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLYD	CARD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.45%	-93.51%	-4.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.15%	-46.11%	-9.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-94.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.39%	-92.18%	-6.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-83.26%	-68.77%	-14.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.03%	31.66%	-1.63%

Volatility

FLYD vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) has a higher volatility of 26.01% compared to Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) at 23.66%. This indicates that FLYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CARD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLYD	CARD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.01%	23.66%	+2.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	62.95%	52.57%	+10.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.71%	70.15%	+5.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.83%	80.64%	+3.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.83%	80.64%	+3.19%

FLYD vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLYD and CARD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

FLYD vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLYD nor CARD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLYD and CARD in my portfolio?

FLYD and CARD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLYD or CARD?

FLYD has higher volatility (26.01%) compared to CARD (23.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLYD dropped -98.45% vs CARD's -93.51%.

Which ETF is better, FLYD or CARD?

On 1-year performance, CARD leads with -35.50% vs -55.29% for FLYD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, CARD has been the lower-risk option at 23.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLYD or CARD?

Over the 1-year period, CARD has performed better with a -35.50% return vs -55.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLYD or CARD?

FLYD and CARD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLYD or CARD?

FLYD and CARD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FLYD and CARD?

FLYD tracks MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index, while CARD tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). They also come from different issuers: REX and Max.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CARD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.