PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXX.L vs. QDIV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXX.L vs. QDIV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FLXX.L) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (QDIV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FLXX.L is traded in GBP, while QDIV.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QDIV.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXX.L achieves a 12.48% return, which is significantly lower than QDIV.L's 14.09% return.


FLXX.L

1D
0.68%
1M
-0.18%
6M
8.58%
YTD
12.48%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
14.72%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*

QDIV.L

1D
-0.36%
1M
-1.65%
6M
10.87%
YTD
14.09%
1Y
23.86%
3Y*
16.38%
5Y*
12.37%
10Y*
10.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXX.L vs. QDIV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLXX.L
Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
12.48%6.53%17.14%4.43%1.45%20.91%1.97%19.18%-3.07%2.23%
QDIV.L
iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
14.09%8.35%17.37%8.59%4.92%22.97%-2.86%16.74%1.87%5.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXX.L and QDIV.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2017

0.75

The correlation between FLXX.L and QDIV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXX.L vs. QDIV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXX.L
FLXX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FLXX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

QDIV.L
QDIV.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QDIV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDIV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDIV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
QDIV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDIV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXX.L vs. QDIV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FLXX.L) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (QDIV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLXX.LQDIV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.37

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

4.34

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.21

14.47

-2.26

FLXX.L vs. QDIV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the QDIV.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXX.L and QDIV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLXX.L vs. QDIV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXX.L drawdown since its inception was -26.51%, roughly equal to the maximum QDIV.L drawdown of -25.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXX.L and QDIV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXX.LQDIV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.51%

-25.30%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.74%

-5.47%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.05%

-19.21%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.05%

-19.21%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.11%

-2.06%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-3.65%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

1.64%

-0.10%

Volatility

FLXX.L vs. QDIV.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FLXX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (QDIV.L) at 3.45%. This indicates that FLXX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDIV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXX.LQDIV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

3.45%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.41%

9.34%

-1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.07%

11.68%

-2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.05%

14.27%

-3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.05%

15.46%

-2.41%

FLXX.L vs. QDIV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXX.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than QDIV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLXX.L vs. QDIV.L - Dividend Comparison

FLXX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than QDIV.L's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLXX.L
Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.50%2.70%2.40%2.79%2.97%2.30%2.58%3.30%3.23%0.45%0.00%0.00%
QDIV.L
iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.51%1.67%1.93%2.00%2.27%2.08%2.50%2.36%2.44%2.15%2.32%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLXX.L and QDIV.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXX.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXX.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for QDIV.L.

FLXX.L tracks LibertyQ Global Dividend Index - Net Return, while QDIV.L tracks MSCI USA High Dividend Yield Advanced Select Index USD. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FLXX.L and 0.35% for QDIV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXX.L and QDIV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer