PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXU.L vs. LCUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXU.L vs. LCUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L) and Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF (LCUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FLXU.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
5.23%
YTD
12.19%
6M
11.97%
1Y
30.69%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*

LCUS.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXU.L vs. LCUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLXU.L
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF
12.19%13.10%12.49%8.52%2.19%28.57%5.69%24.32%5.51%
LCUS.L
Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF
0.00%3.57%27.38%20.34%-12.04%27.36%14.33%24.68%2.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXU.L and LCUS.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018

0.81

The correlation between FLXU.L and LCUS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLXU.L vs. LCUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLXU.L
LCUS.L

Technology

34.3%
31.9%

Communication Services

12.2%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
11.6%

Healthcare

10.5%
10.4%

Industrials

10.1%
7.7%

Financial Services

9.9%
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
5.3%

Real Estate

2.9%
2.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.8%

Utilities

1.6%
2.4%

Energy

1.0%
3.1%

Technology

FLXU.L
34.3%
LCUS.L
31.9%

Communication Services

FLXU.L
12.2%
LCUS.L
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FLXU.L
11.5%
LCUS.L
11.6%

Healthcare

FLXU.L
10.5%
LCUS.L
10.4%

Industrials

FLXU.L
10.1%
LCUS.L
7.7%

Financial Services

FLXU.L
9.9%
LCUS.L
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

FLXU.L
4.4%
LCUS.L
5.3%

Real Estate

FLXU.L
2.9%
LCUS.L
2.1%

Basic Materials

FLXU.L
1.7%
LCUS.L
1.8%

Utilities

FLXU.L
1.6%
LCUS.L
2.4%

Energy

FLXU.L
1.0%
LCUS.L
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXU.L vs. LCUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXU.L
FLXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FLXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUS.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXU.L vs. LCUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L) and Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF (LCUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLXU.LLCUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.83

FLXU.L vs. LCUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLXU.LLCUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

Drawdowns

FLXU.L vs. LCUS.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXU.LLCUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

Volatility

FLXU.L vs. LCUS.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXU.LLCUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.93%

FLXU.L vs. LCUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUS.L's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLXU.L vs. LCUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLXU.L nor LCUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FLXU.L
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LCUS.L
Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.83%0.77%0.69%0.48%0.02%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLXU.L and LCUS.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUS.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUS.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FLXU.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLXU.L and 0.04% for LCUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXU.L and LCUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer