FLXU.L vs. GSLC.L
FLXU.L (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF) and GSLC.L (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from Franklin Templeton and Goldman Sachs respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLXU.L returned 13.30%/yr vs 13.87%/yr for GSLC.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLXU.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for GSLC.L.
Performance
FLXU.L vs. GSLC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FLXU.L is traded in GBP, while GSLC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GSLC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXU.L achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly higher than GSLC.L's 9.62% return.
FLXU.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 12.19%
- 6M
- 11.97%
- 1Y
- 30.69%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- —
GSLC.L
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 9.62%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 24.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.87%
- 10Y*
- —
FLXU.L vs. GSLC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXU.L Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF | 12.19% | 13.10% | 12.49% | 8.52% | 2.19% | 28.57% | 5.69% | 0.42% |
GSLC.L Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) | 9.62% | 8.16% | 25.19% | 19.34% | -9.56% | 27.38% | 18.66% | -1.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXU.L and GSLC.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, FLXU.L and GSLC.L have become more correlated (0.86) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.
FLXU.L vs. GSLC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLXU.L
GSLC.L
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
-
Technology
FLXU.L
GSLC.L
Communication Services
FLXU.L
GSLC.L
Consumer Cyclical
FLXU.L
GSLC.L
Healthcare
FLXU.L
GSLC.L
Industrials
FLXU.L
GSLC.L
Financial Services
FLXU.L
GSLC.L
Consumer Defensive
FLXU.L
GSLC.L
Real Estate
FLXU.L
GSLC.L
Basic Materials
FLXU.L
GSLC.L
Utilities
FLXU.L
GSLC.L
Energy
FLXU.L
GSLC.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXU.L vs. GSLC.L — Risk / Return Rank
FLXU.L
GSLC.L
FLXU.L vs. GSLC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GSLC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLXU.L | GSLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.32 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.18 | 2.71 | +2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.83 | 9.02 | +9.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLXU.L | GSLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72 | 1.81 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 1.11 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 1.17 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
FLXU.L vs. GSLC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXU.L drawdown since its inception was -24.72%, which is greater than GSLC.L's maximum drawdown of -21.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXU.L and GSLC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXU.L | GSLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.72% | -21.03% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.90% | -8.88% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -21.03% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.13% | -21.03% | +0.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.06% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -3.68% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 2.67% | -1.04% |
Volatility
FLXU.L vs. GSLC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L) is 3.47%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GSLC.L) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that FLXU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSLC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXU.L | GSLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 4.14% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.19% | 9.84% | -1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.24% | 13.33% | -2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.07% | 18.28% | -5.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 19.39% | -4.46% |
FLXU.L vs. GSLC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GSLC.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLXU.L vs. GSLC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLXU.L nor GSLC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLXU.L and GSLC.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSLC.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSLC.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FLXU.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLXU.L and 0.14% for GSLC.L.
Find the right allocation for FLXU.L and GSLC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer