FLXU.L vs. FRQX.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FLXU.L (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF) and FRQX.L (Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLXU.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while FRQX.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLXU.L returned 13.30%/yr vs 14.74%/yr for FRQX.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLXU.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for FRQX.L.

Performance

FLXU.L vs. FRQX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L) and Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXU.L achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly lower than FRQX.L's 43.69% return.

FLXU.L

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 5.23%
• YTD: 12.19%
• 6M: 11.97%
• 1Y: 30.69%
• 3Y*: 15.71%
• 5Y*: 13.30%
• 10Y*: —

FRQX.L

• 1D: -2.00%
• 1M: 10.47%
• YTD: 43.69%
• 6M: 48.15%
• 1Y: 78.41%
• 3Y*: 26.02%
• 5Y*: 14.74%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXU.L vs. FRQX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLXU.L Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF	12.19%	13.10%	12.49%	8.52%	2.19%	28.57%	5.69%	24.32%	-9.79%
FRQX.L Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF	43.69%	21.13%	9.39%	5.79%	-2.53%	5.94%	3.15%	6.30%	-4.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXU.L and FRQX.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018	0.54

The correlation between FLXU.L and FRQX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLXU.L vs. FRQX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLXU.L	FRQX.L
Technology	34.3%	54.7%
Communication Services	12.2%	2.4%
Consumer Cyclical	11.5%	4.6%
Healthcare	10.5%	2.2%
Industrials	10.1%	8.9%
Financial Services	9.9%	15.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	2.2%
Real Estate	2.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.7%	3.2%
Utilities	1.6%	1.9%
Energy	1.0%	2.3%

Return for Risk

FLXU.L vs. FRQX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXU.L

FLXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
FLXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FLXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FLXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FLXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FLXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FRQX.L

FRQX.L Risk / Return Rank: 94
FRQX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FRQX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FRQX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FRQX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FRQX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXU.L vs. FRQX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L) and Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLXU.L	FRQX.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	4.05	-1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.77	5.31	-1.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.71	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.18	5.97	-0.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.83	23.58	-4.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLXU.L vs. FRQX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is lower than the FRQX.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXU.L and FRQX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLXU.L	FRQX.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.72	4.05	-1.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.02	1.00	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.65	+0.24

Drawdowns

FLXU.L vs. FRQX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXU.L drawdown since its inception was -24.72%, which is greater than FRQX.L's maximum drawdown of -20.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXU.L and FRQX.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLXU.L	FRQX.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.72%	-20.77%	-3.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.90%	-13.07%	+7.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.13%	-19.42%	-0.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.13%	-19.42%	-0.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-2.56%	+2.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.01%	-3.94%	+0.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	3.31%	-1.68%

Volatility

FLXU.L vs. FRQX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L) is 3.47%, while Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that FLXU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRQX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLXU.L	FRQX.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.47%	7.40%	-3.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.19%	16.78%	-8.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.24%	19.27%	-8.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.07%	14.77%	-1.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.93%	16.44%	-1.51%

FLXU.L vs. FRQX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQX.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLXU.L vs. FRQX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLXU.L nor FRQX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLXU.L and FRQX.L in my portfolio?

FLXU.L and FRQX.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLXU.L or FRQX.L?

On fees, FLXU.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLXU.L or FRQX.L?

FLXU.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FRQX.L.

What is the main difference between FLXU.L and FRQX.L?

FLXU.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FRQX.L is Asia Pacific Equities. FLXU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while FRQX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLXU.L and 0.40% for FRQX.L.