FLXU.L vs. BBDD.L
FLXU.L (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF) and BBDD.L (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from Franklin Templeton and JPMorgan respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLXU.L returned 13.30%/yr vs 14.50%/yr for BBDD.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLXU.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BBDD.L.
Performance
FLXU.L vs. BBDD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FLXU.L is traded in GBP, while BBDD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BBDD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXU.L achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly higher than BBDD.L's 10.30% return.
FLXU.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 12.19%
- 6M
- 11.97%
- 1Y
- 30.69%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- —
BBDD.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 10.30%
- 6M
- 10.10%
- 1Y
- 28.61%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 14.50%
- 10Y*
- —
FLXU.L vs. BBDD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXU.L Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF | 12.19% | 13.10% | 12.49% | 8.52% | 2.19% | 28.57% | 5.69% | 10.31% |
BBDD.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) | 10.30% | 9.41% | 27.20% | 20.72% | -10.45% | 29.23% | 16.11% | 11.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXU.L and BBDD.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019 | 0.91 |
The correlation between FLXU.L and BBDD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLXU.L vs. BBDD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLXU.L
BBDD.L
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
FLXU.L
BBDD.L
Communication Services
FLXU.L
BBDD.L
Consumer Cyclical
FLXU.L
BBDD.L
Healthcare
FLXU.L
BBDD.L
Industrials
FLXU.L
BBDD.L
Financial Services
FLXU.L
BBDD.L
Consumer Defensive
FLXU.L
BBDD.L
Real Estate
FLXU.L
BBDD.L
Basic Materials
FLXU.L
BBDD.L
Utilities
FLXU.L
BBDD.L
Energy
FLXU.L
BBDD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXU.L vs. BBDD.L — Risk / Return Rank
FLXU.L
BBDD.L
FLXU.L vs. BBDD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLXU.L | BBDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.50 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.18 | 3.66 | +1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.83 | 12.78 | +6.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLXU.L | BBDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72 | 2.69 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 1.00 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.96 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
FLXU.L vs. BBDD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXU.L drawdown since its inception was -24.72%, roughly equal to the maximum BBDD.L drawdown of -25.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXU.L and BBDD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXU.L | BBDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.72% | -25.72% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.90% | -7.78% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -21.41% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.13% | -21.41% | +1.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.16% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -3.72% | +0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 2.23% | -0.60% |
Volatility
FLXU.L vs. BBDD.L - Volatility Comparison
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L) at 2.63%. This indicates that FLXU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBDD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXU.L | BBDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 2.63% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.19% | 7.24% | +0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.24% | 10.57% | +0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.07% | 14.47% | -1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 16.17% | -1.24% |
FLXU.L vs. BBDD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BBDD.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLXU.L vs. BBDD.L - Dividend Comparison
FLXU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBDD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBDD.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) | 0.99% | 1.12% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.44% | 0.94% | 1.46% | 0.79% |
FLXU.L Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, FLXU.L and BBDD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BBDD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBDD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FLXU.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLXU.L and 0.05% for BBDD.L.
Find the right allocation for FLXU.L and BBDD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer