PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXN vs. SMOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXN vs. SMOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN) and Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (SMOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXN achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly lower than SMOX's 20.26% return.


FLXN

1D
0.18%
1M
0.08%
6M
1.62%
YTD
2.74%
1Y
7.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.08%

SMOX

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.40%
6M
13.42%
YTD
20.26%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$153.76K$129.72K$280.31K
$489.01K$493.61K$435.66K

FLXN vs. SMOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FLXN
Horizon Flexible Income ETF
2.74%0.68%
SMOX
Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
20.26%0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXN and SMOX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

0.69

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXN vs. SMOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXN
FLXN Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FLXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXN Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXN Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

SMOX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXN vs. SMOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN) and Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (SMOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLXNSMOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.45

FLXN vs. SMOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLXN vs. SMOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXN drawdown since its inception was -3.39%, smaller than the maximum SMOX drawdown of -7.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXN and SMOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXNSMOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

-7.76%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-1.41%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.37%

-1.39%

+1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

Volatility

FLXN vs. SMOX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXNSMOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.00%

14.92%

-9.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.91%

14.92%

-10.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.91%

14.92%

-10.01%

FLXN vs. SMOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than SMOX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLXN vs. SMOX - Dividend Comparison

FLXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.32%, more than SMOX's 0.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025
FLXN
Horizon Flexible Income ETF
9.32%3.49%
SMOX
Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
0.07%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLXN and SMOX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMOX is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMOX is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for FLXN.

FLXN has the higher dividend yield at 9.32%, compared with 0.07% for SMOX.

FLXN is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SMOX is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for FLXN and 0.75% for SMOX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXN and SMOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer