PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXN vs. HYZD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXN vs. HYZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FLXN having a 3.25% return and HYZD slightly lower at 3.09%.


FLXN

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.35%
6M
2.73%
YTD
3.25%
1Y
8.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYZD

1D
0.01%
1M
0.49%
6M
2.91%
YTD
3.09%
1Y
6.81%
3Y*
8.93%
5Y*
6.12%
10Y*
5.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXN vs. HYZD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FLXN and HYZD is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2025

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXN vs. HYZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXN
FLXN Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FLXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXN Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

HYZD
HYZD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HYZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYZD Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HYZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYZD Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXN vs. HYZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLXNHYZDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.47

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

3.58

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.39

15.43

-3.03

FLXN vs. HYZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXN Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the HYZD Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXN and HYZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLXN vs. HYZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXN drawdown since its inception was -3.39%, smaller than the maximum HYZD drawdown of -25.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXN and HYZD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXNHYZDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

-25.66%

+22.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.39%

-1.91%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.04%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.37%

-2.19%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

0.44%

+0.25%

Volatility

FLXN vs. HYZD - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD) at 0.68%. This indicates that FLXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXNHYZDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

0.68%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.96%

2.44%

+1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.00%

3.02%

+1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.99%

6.70%

-1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.99%

8.52%

-3.53%

FLXN vs. HYZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than HYZD's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLXN vs. HYZD - Dividend Comparison

FLXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.40%, more than HYZD's 5.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLXN
Horizon Flexible Income ETF
8.40%3.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund
5.88%6.05%6.08%5.94%5.14%4.02%5.13%5.50%5.58%4.94%5.07%4.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLXN and HYZD have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLXN has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to HYZD (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLXN dropped -3.39% vs HYZD's -25.66%.

On 1-year performance, FLXN leads with 8.51% vs 6.81% for HYZD. On fees, HYZD is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, HYZD has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FLXN has performed better with a 8.51% return vs 6.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYZD is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for FLXN.

FLXN has the higher dividend yield at 8.40%, compared with 5.88% for HYZD.

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for FLXN and 0.43% for HYZD.

HYZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXN and HYZD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer