FLXN vs. HYHG
FLXN (Horizon Flexible Income ETF) and HYHG (ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged) are both High Yield Bonds funds. FLXN is actively managed, while HYHG is passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLXN charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HYHG.
Performance
FLXN vs. HYHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXN achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly lower than HYHG's 3.03% return.
FLXN
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 2.50%
- 6M
- 2.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYHG
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 7.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.99%
- 10Y*
- 6.12%
FLXN vs. HYHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FLXN Horizon Flexible Income ETF | 2.50% | 4.71% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 3.03% | 2.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXN and HYHG is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXN vs. HYHG — Risk / Return Rank
FLXN
HYHG
FLXN vs. HYHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLXN | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.60 | 0.46 | +1.13 |
Drawdowns
FLXN vs. HYHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXN drawdown since its inception was -3.39%, smaller than the maximum HYHG drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXN and HYHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXN | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.39% | -25.71% | +22.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.32% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.38% | -3.04% | +2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.61% | — |
Volatility
FLXN vs. HYHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXN | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.04% | 5.56% | -0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 8.16% | -3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 9.15% | -4.11% |
FLXN vs. HYHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than HYHG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLXN vs. HYHG - Dividend Comparison
FLXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than HYHG's 6.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXN Horizon Flexible Income ETF | 7.49% | 3.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 6.78% | 6.97% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 5.58% | 4.54% | 5.21% | 6.06% | 6.45% | 5.57% | 5.37% | 6.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLXN and HYHG have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HYHG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYHG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for FLXN.
FLXN has the higher dividend yield at 7.49%, compared with 6.78% for HYHG.
They also come from different issuers: Horizon and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for FLXN and 0.50% for HYHG.
Find the right allocation for FLXN and HYHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer