PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXN vs. FSYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXN vs. FSYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN) and Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXN achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly lower than FSYD's 2.98% return.


FLXN

1D
0.18%
1M
0.08%
6M
1.62%
YTD
2.74%
1Y
7.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.08%

FSYD

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.36%
6M
1.77%
YTD
2.98%
1Y
7.17%
3Y*
8.66%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$153.76K$129.72K$280.31K
$1.09M$1.15M$1.31M

FLXN vs. FSYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FLXN
Horizon Flexible Income ETF
2.74%4.71%
FSYD
Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF
2.98%4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXN and FSYD is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2025

0.89

The correlation between FLXN and FSYD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXN vs. FSYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXN
FLXN Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FLXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXN Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXN Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FSYD
FSYD Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FSYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSYD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FSYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSYD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXN vs. FSYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN) and Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLXNFSYDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.34

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.69

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.45

10.62

-0.16

FLXN vs. FSYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXN Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the FSYD Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXN and FSYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLXN vs. FSYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXN drawdown since its inception was -3.39%, smaller than the maximum FSYD drawdown of -12.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXN and FSYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXNFSYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

-12.11%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.39%

-2.67%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.78%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.37%

-2.33%

+1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

0.68%

+0.02%

Volatility

FLXN vs. FSYD - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN) has a higher volatility of 0.88% compared to Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD) at 0.72%. This indicates that FLXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXNFSYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

0.72%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.98%

3.20%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.00%

4.08%

+0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.91%

7.74%

-2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.91%

7.74%

-2.83%

FLXN vs. FSYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than FSYD's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLXN vs. FSYD - Dividend Comparison

FLXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.32%, more than FSYD's 6.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
FLXN
Horizon Flexible Income ETF
9.32%3.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSYD
Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF
6.42%6.49%6.47%6.70%5.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLXN and FSYD have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLXN has higher volatility (0.88%) compared to FSYD (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLXN dropped -3.39% vs FSYD's -12.11%.

On 1-year performance, FLXN leads with 7.28% vs 7.17% for FSYD. On fees, FSYD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, FSYD has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FLXN has performed better with a 7.28% return vs 7.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FSYD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for FLXN.

FLXN has the higher dividend yield at 9.32%, compared with 6.42% for FSYD.

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for FLXN and 0.55% for FSYD.

FSYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXN and FSYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer