PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXK.DE vs. DBX5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXK.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (DBX5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXK.DE achieves a 113.07% return, which is significantly higher than DBX5.DE's 69.45% return.


FLXK.DE

1D
-5.45%
1M
18.44%
YTD
113.07%
6M
130.94%
1Y
225.04%
3Y*
46.07%
5Y*
20.42%
10Y*

DBX5.DE

1D
-1.95%
1M
14.40%
YTD
69.45%
6M
74.72%
1Y
112.23%
3Y*
40.65%
5Y*
22.99%
10Y*
22.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXK.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLXK.DE
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF
113.07%73.17%-17.06%16.74%-23.45%0.14%34.15%14.19%
DBX5.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C
69.45%18.33%31.08%24.15%-25.19%37.79%24.51%31.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXK.DE and DBX5.DE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2019

0.68

The correlation between FLXK.DE and DBX5.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXK.DE vs. DBX5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXK.DE
FLXK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FLXK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

DBX5.DE
DBX5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DBX5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBX5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBX5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DBX5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBX5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXK.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (DBX5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLXK.DEDBX5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.79

1.74

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.68

12.09

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.63

35.84

+2.79

FLXK.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 5.91, which is comparable to the DBX5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXK.DE and DBX5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLXK.DEDBX5.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.91

4.62

+1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

1.05

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.54

+0.30

Drawdowns

FLXK.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXK.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.43%, smaller than the maximum DBX5.DE drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXK.DE and DBX5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXK.DEDBX5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.43%

-55.28%

+15.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.92%

-9.23%

-11.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.99%

-30.81%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.36%

-32.62%

-6.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.90%

-1.97%

-3.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.54%

-11.61%

-3.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.80%

3.12%

+2.68%

Volatility

FLXK.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.DE) has a higher volatility of 17.58% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (DBX5.DE) at 10.28%. This indicates that FLXK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBX5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXK.DEDBX5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.58%

10.28%

+7.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.23%

19.59%

+13.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.87%

24.18%

+13.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.35%

21.58%

+3.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.75%

20.55%

+6.20%

FLXK.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXK.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DBX5.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLXK.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLXK.DE nor DBX5.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FLXK.DE and DBX5.DE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXK.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXK.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DBX5.DE.

FLXK.DE tracks FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped, while DBX5.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Custom. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLXK.DE and 0.65% for DBX5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXK.DE and DBX5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer