PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXI.L vs. CI2G.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXI.L vs. CI2G.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXI.L) and Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (CI2G.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FLXI.L is traded in USD, while CI2G.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CI2G.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXI.L achieves a -8.81% return, which is significantly higher than CI2G.L's -11.04% return.


FLXI.L

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.58%
6M
-7.62%
YTD
-8.81%
1Y
-10.28%
3Y*
5.25%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*

CI2G.L

1D
-0.14%
1M
-1.29%
6M
-9.17%
YTD
-11.04%
1Y
-12.94%
3Y*
3.35%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
6.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXI.L vs. CI2G.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLXI.L
Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-8.81%2.92%10.75%22.03%-8.29%24.89%13.06%-0.07%
CI2G.L
Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD
-11.04%1.88%9.49%18.12%-8.55%23.73%13.90%0.55%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXI.L and CI2G.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2019

0.92

The correlation between FLXI.L and CI2G.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXI.L vs. CI2G.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXI.L
FLXI.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FLXI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

CI2G.L
CI2G.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CI2G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CI2G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CI2G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CI2G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CI2G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXI.L vs. CI2G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXI.L) and Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (CI2G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLXI.LCI2G.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.88

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

-0.62

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.31

-1.37

+0.06

FLXI.L vs. CI2G.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXI.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is comparable to the CI2G.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXI.L and CI2G.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLXI.L vs. CI2G.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXI.L drawdown since its inception was -41.86%, smaller than the maximum CI2G.L drawdown of -49.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXI.L and CI2G.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXI.LCI2G.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.86%

-49.48%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.12%

-20.38%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.99%

-27.55%

+4.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.99%

-27.55%

+4.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.25%

-21.34%

+5.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-18.24%

+9.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.82%

9.26%

-1.44%

Volatility

FLXI.L vs. CI2G.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXI.L) and Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (CI2G.L) have volatilities of 3.99% and 4.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXI.LCI2G.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

4.10%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.02%

13.78%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.04%

16.34%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

17.24%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.38%

20.63%

+0.75%

FLXI.L vs. CI2G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXI.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CI2G.L's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLXI.L vs. CI2G.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLXI.L nor CI2G.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FLXI.L and CI2G.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FLXI.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXI.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for CI2G.L.

FLXI.L tracks FTSE India 30/18 Capped Index - Net Return, while CI2G.L tracks MSCI India NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLXI.L and 0.80% for CI2G.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXI.L and CI2G.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer