FLXI.DE vs. SXR1.DE
FLXI.DE (Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF) and SXR1.DE (iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - FLXI.DE tracks the FTSE India 30/18 Capped while SXR1.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLXI.DE returned 6.23%/yr vs 5.85%/yr for SXR1.DE. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLXI.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SXR1.DE.
Performance
FLXI.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXI.DE achieves a -4.45% return, which is significantly lower than SXR1.DE's 9.00% return.
FLXI.DE
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- -4.45%
- 6M
- -5.34%
- 1Y
- -6.72%
- 3Y*
- 5.67%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- —
SXR1.DE
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 15.32%
- 3Y*
- 11.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.85%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
FLXI.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXI.DE Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF | -4.45% | -8.72% | 16.97% | 17.28% | -1.80% | 35.51% | 1.87% | 1.08% |
SXR1.DE iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) | 9.00% | 7.00% | 11.91% | 2.20% | -0.86% | 13.17% | -2.98% | 3.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXI.DE and SXR1.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXI.DE vs. SXR1.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FLXI.DE
SXR1.DE
FLXI.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FLXI.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLXI.DE | SXR1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.23 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 2.46 | -2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 7.14 | -8.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLXI.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXI.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.58%, which is greater than SXR1.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXI.DE and SXR1.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXI.DE | SXR1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.58% | -38.62% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.84% | -6.21% | -10.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.76% | -20.28% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.76% | -20.28% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.03% | -2.08% | -14.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.86% | -9.84% | +1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.83% | 2.14% | +5.69% |
Volatility
FLXI.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FLXI.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE) at 3.79%. This indicates that FLXI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SXR1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXI.DE | SXR1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 3.79% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.58% | 9.39% | +3.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.09% | 11.91% | +3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 14.78% | +1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 16.55% | +3.39% |
FLXI.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXI.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SXR1.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLXI.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLXI.DE nor SXR1.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLXI.DE and SXR1.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXI.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXI.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SXR1.DE.
FLXI.DE tracks FTSE India 30/18 Capped, while SXR1.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLXI.DE and 0.20% for SXR1.DE.
Find the right allocation for FLXI.DE and SXR1.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer