PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXE.L vs. MSDG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXE.L vs. MSDG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L) and Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) (MSDG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FLXE.L is traded in GBP, while MSDG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MSDG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FLXE.L having a 15.59% return and MSDG.L slightly higher at 15.79%.


FLXE.L

1D
-0.73%
1M
2.79%
YTD
15.59%
6M
15.92%
1Y
33.57%
3Y*
15.98%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*

MSDG.L

1D
-1.16%
1M
3.94%
YTD
15.79%
6M
16.42%
1Y
36.37%
3Y*
12.81%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXE.L vs. MSDG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FLXE.L
Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF
15.59%18.87%8.11%6.48%-9.68%8.46%7.30%
MSDG.L
Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D)
15.79%18.98%8.37%-6.49%-7.74%-0.36%23.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXE.L and MSDG.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020

0.36

The correlation between FLXE.L and MSDG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLXE.L vs. MSDG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLXE.L
MSDG.L

Financial Services

21.1%
17.8%

Technology

11.9%
40.8%

Consumer Defensive

11.8%
5.0%

Energy

11.7%

-

Industrials

9.8%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
10.1%

Communication Services

8.7%
3.5%

Basic Materials

7.5%
3.2%

Utilities

3.3%
3.1%

Healthcare

2.5%
5.2%

Real Estate

2.5%
2.9%

Financial Services

FLXE.L
21.1%
MSDG.L
17.8%

Technology

FLXE.L
11.9%
MSDG.L
40.8%

Consumer Defensive

FLXE.L
11.8%
MSDG.L
5.0%

Energy

FLXE.L
11.7%
MSDG.L

-

Industrials

FLXE.L
9.8%
MSDG.L
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FLXE.L
9.5%
MSDG.L
10.1%

Communication Services

FLXE.L
8.7%
MSDG.L
3.5%

Basic Materials

FLXE.L
7.5%
MSDG.L
3.2%

Utilities

FLXE.L
3.3%
MSDG.L
3.1%

Healthcare

FLXE.L
2.5%
MSDG.L
5.2%

Real Estate

FLXE.L
2.5%
MSDG.L
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXE.L vs. MSDG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXE.L
FLXE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FLXE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

MSDG.L
MSDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MSDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
MSDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXE.L vs. MSDG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L) and Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) (MSDG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLXE.LMSDG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.51

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

4.89

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.16

14.40

-2.24

FLXE.L vs. MSDG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the MSDG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXE.L and MSDG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLXE.LMSDG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.88

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.42

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.77

-0.42

Drawdowns

FLXE.L vs. MSDG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXE.L drawdown since its inception was -26.37%, roughly equal to the maximum MSDG.L drawdown of -27.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXE.L and MSDG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXE.LMSDG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.37%

-27.21%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.11%

-10.09%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.93%

-18.31%

+7.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.31%

-25.79%

+9.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-1.73%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-10.68%

+4.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

4.22%

-1.47%

Volatility

FLXE.L vs. MSDG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L) is 4.62%, while Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) (MSDG.L) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that FLXE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSDG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXE.LMSDG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

5.41%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.77%

12.70%

-1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

17.16%

-4.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.03%

22.13%

-9.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.45%

24.53%

-9.08%

FLXE.L vs. MSDG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXE.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than MSDG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLXE.L vs. MSDG.L - Dividend Comparison

FLXE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSDG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FLXE.L
Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSDG.L
Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D)
1.67%1.94%2.09%2.27%2.24%1.69%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLXE.L and MSDG.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MSDG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSDG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FLXE.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FLXE.L and 0.25% for MSDG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXE.L and MSDG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer