FLXE.L vs. MSDG.L
FLXE.L (Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF) and MSDG.L (Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from Franklin Templeton and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLXE.L returned 7.79%/yr vs 4.09%/yr for MSDG.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLXE.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for MSDG.L.
Performance
FLXE.L vs. MSDG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FLXE.L is traded in GBP, while MSDG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MSDG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FLXE.L having a 15.59% return and MSDG.L slightly higher at 15.79%.
FLXE.L
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 15.59%
- 6M
- 15.92%
- 1Y
- 33.57%
- 3Y*
- 15.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- —
MSDG.L
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 15.79%
- 6M
- 16.42%
- 1Y
- 36.37%
- 3Y*
- 12.81%
- 5Y*
- 4.09%
- 10Y*
- —
FLXE.L vs. MSDG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXE.L Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF | 15.59% | 18.87% | 8.11% | 6.48% | -9.68% | 8.46% | 7.30% |
MSDG.L Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) | 15.79% | 18.98% | 8.37% | -6.49% | -7.74% | -0.36% | 23.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXE.L and MSDG.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020 | 0.36 |
The correlation between FLXE.L and MSDG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FLXE.L vs. MSDG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLXE.L
MSDG.L
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Financial Services
FLXE.L
MSDG.L
Technology
FLXE.L
MSDG.L
Consumer Defensive
FLXE.L
MSDG.L
Energy
FLXE.L
MSDG.L
-
Industrials
FLXE.L
MSDG.L
Consumer Cyclical
FLXE.L
MSDG.L
Communication Services
FLXE.L
MSDG.L
Basic Materials
FLXE.L
MSDG.L
Utilities
FLXE.L
MSDG.L
Healthcare
FLXE.L
MSDG.L
Real Estate
FLXE.L
MSDG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXE.L vs. MSDG.L — Risk / Return Rank
FLXE.L
MSDG.L
FLXE.L vs. MSDG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L) and Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) (MSDG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLXE.L | MSDG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.51 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 4.89 | -1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.16 | 14.40 | -2.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLXE.L | MSDG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 2.88 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.42 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.77 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
FLXE.L vs. MSDG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXE.L drawdown since its inception was -26.37%, roughly equal to the maximum MSDG.L drawdown of -27.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXE.L and MSDG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXE.L | MSDG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.37% | -27.21% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.11% | -10.09% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.93% | -18.31% | +7.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.31% | -25.79% | +9.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -1.73% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -10.68% | +4.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 4.22% | -1.47% |
Volatility
FLXE.L vs. MSDG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L) is 4.62%, while Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) (MSDG.L) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that FLXE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSDG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXE.L | MSDG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 5.41% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.77% | 12.70% | -1.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.71% | 17.16% | -4.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.03% | 22.13% | -9.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 24.53% | -9.08% |
FLXE.L vs. MSDG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXE.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than MSDG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLXE.L vs. MSDG.L - Dividend Comparison
FLXE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSDG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXE.L Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSDG.L Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 2.27% | 2.24% | 1.69% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLXE.L and MSDG.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSDG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSDG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FLXE.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FLXE.L and 0.25% for MSDG.L.
Find the right allocation for FLXE.L and MSDG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer