PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXD.L vs. MVEW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXD.L vs. MVEW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXD.L achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly higher than MVEW.L's 0.37% return.


FLXD.L

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
9.29%
6M
12.43%
1Y
20.53%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*

MVEW.L

1D
0.20%
1M
1.97%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.14%
1Y
3.27%
3Y*
6.64%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXD.L vs. MVEW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
9.29%31.50%8.51%9.23%6.26%10.54%7.05%
MVEW.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.37%3.73%12.44%4.00%-0.60%18.17%-1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXD.L and MVEW.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2020

0.51

The correlation between FLXD.L and MVEW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLXD.L vs. MVEW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLXD.L
MVEW.L

Financial Services

35.8%
15.2%

Communication Services

16.3%
10.5%

Energy

11.6%
3.3%

Healthcare

10.3%
14.9%

Industrials

7.9%
8.2%

Basic Materials

5.2%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
10.2%

Real Estate

3.5%
1.4%

Utilities

3.1%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
5.4%

Technology

0.7%
22.6%

Financial Services

FLXD.L
35.8%
MVEW.L
15.2%

Communication Services

FLXD.L
16.3%
MVEW.L
10.5%

Energy

FLXD.L
11.6%
MVEW.L
3.3%

Healthcare

FLXD.L
10.3%
MVEW.L
14.9%

Industrials

FLXD.L
7.9%
MVEW.L
8.2%

Basic Materials

FLXD.L
5.2%
MVEW.L
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

FLXD.L
4.6%
MVEW.L
10.2%

Real Estate

FLXD.L
3.5%
MVEW.L
1.4%

Utilities

FLXD.L
3.1%
MVEW.L
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FLXD.L
1.0%
MVEW.L
5.4%

Technology

FLXD.L
0.7%
MVEW.L
22.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXD.L vs. MVEW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXD.L
FLXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

MVEW.L
MVEW.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MVEW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXD.L vs. MVEW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLXD.LMVEW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.07

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.64

0.56

+5.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.75

1.47

+14.28

FLXD.L vs. MVEW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the MVEW.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXD.L and MVEW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLXD.LMVEW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

0.41

+1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

0.68

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.60

+0.04

Drawdowns

FLXD.L vs. MVEW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXD.L drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, which is greater than MVEW.L's maximum drawdown of -10.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXD.L and MVEW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXD.LMVEW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.71%

-10.07%

-19.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.62%

-5.85%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.78%

-9.04%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.76%

-10.07%

-1.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-3.02%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-2.57%

-1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

2.22%

-0.92%

Volatility

FLXD.L vs. MVEW.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) have volatilities of 2.67% and 2.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXD.LMVEW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

2.63%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.95%

5.97%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.52%

8.00%

+0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.85%

9.78%

+1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.91%

10.08%

+2.83%

FLXD.L vs. MVEW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MVEW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLXD.L vs. MVEW.L - Dividend Comparison

FLXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, while MVEW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
4.37%4.90%5.18%5.75%5.87%5.51%3.90%1.53%1.09%
MVEW.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLXD.L and MVEW.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MVEW.L.

FLXD.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while MVEW.L is Global Equities. FLXD.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR, while MVEW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLXD.L and 0.30% for MVEW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXD.L and MVEW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer